SANJAY YADAV, B.K.SHRIVASTAVA
Shambhoo Singh Raghuvanshi – Appellant
Versus
High Court Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Sanjay Yadav, J. - Petitioner, member of Higher Judicial Service, State of Madhya Pradesh, presently posted as District and Sessions Judge, Sheopur, calls in question the legality of Final Report dated 30.04.2019 by the Gender Sensitization and Internal Complaint Committee for the High Court and Subordinate Courts, and the show cause notice dated 29.11.2019. The petitioner seeks quashment thereof and direction that a settlement shall be recorded on the conciliation application dated 24.11.2018 submitted by the complainant. Further direction is sought that, the petitioner be relieved of all the consequences arising from the issue of show cause notice dated 29.11.2019.
2. The genesis of the action proposed is the written complaint received by Registrar (Vigilance) from a lady Judge, once posted under the petitioner, against the present petitioner who, at the relevant time, was posted as District and Sessions Judge, Khandwa. The copy of complaint is filed by the petitioner as Annexure P/3; however, we refrain from reproducing the same in order to protect the complainant, a lady Judicial Officer from ignominy. (For the sake of privacy, we are not disclosing the identity of the
A.K. Kraipak vs. Union of India
Apparel Export Promotion Council vs. A. K. Chopra
D. K. Basu vs. State of W. B., (1997) 1 SCC 416
Kumaon Mandal Vikas Nigam Ltd. vs. Girja Shankar Pant
Mackinnon Mackenzie and Co. Ltd. vs. Audrey D Costa
People s Union for Civil Liberties vs. Union of India
Prem Shankar Shukla vs. Delhi Admn.
Salem Advocate Bar Assn. (II) vs. Union of India
Sheela Barse vs. Secy., Children s Aid Society, (1987) 3 SCC 50
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.