ROHIT ARYA
Dharmendra Jatav – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Rohit Arya, J.
1. The controversy involved in this writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India revolves around the scope, limit and dimensions of the provision contained under section 165(7-b) of the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 (for short, 'the Code'). For ready reference the provision is quoted below:
… … …
(7-b) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), a person who holds land from the State Government or a person who holds land in bhumiswami rights under sub-section (3) of Section 158 or whom right to occupy land is granted by the State Government or the Collector as a Government lessee and who subsequently becomes bhumiswami of such land, shall not transfer such land without the permission of a Revenue Officer, not below the rank of a Collector, given for reasons to be recorded in writing."
(Emphasis supplied)
and collaterally section 158(3) of the Code. The relevant provision is quoted below:
"158. Bhumiswami. (1) Every person who at the time of coming into force of th
Ashok Kapil Vs. Sana Ullah (Dead) and others
Dhurandhar Prasad Singh Vs. Jai Prakash University and others
Eureka Forbes Limited Vs. Allahabad Bank and others
Hukum Singh (Dead) by LR., and others Vs. State of M.P.
Keshabo and another Vs. State of M.P., and others
Mulayam Singh and another Vs. Budhawa Chamar and others
Mulayam Singh and others Vs. Budhawa Chamar and others
Ramgopal Kanhaiyalal Vs. Chetu Batte AIR 1976 MP 160
Rohini Prasad and others Vs. Kasturchand and another
Savina Park Resorts and Tours Pvt. Limited Vs. State of M.P., and others
Savina Park Resorts and Tours Pvt., Ltd., Vs. State of M.P., and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.