SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 3715

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
NEERAJ TIWARI
Abhinav Singh – Appellant
Versus
Board Of Revenue U.P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Amit Kumar Rai
For the Respondents: C.S.C., Shyam Surat Shukla

JUDGMENT :

NEERAJ TIWARI, J.

1. Heard Sri Amit Kumar Rai, learned counsel for petitioner, learned standing counsel for respondent nos. 2 to 4, Sri Shyam Surat Shukla, learned counsel for respondent no. 6 and Mr. Samir Sharma, learned Senior Counsel as amicus curiae appointed by this Court vide order dated26.08.2025.

2. Present petition has been filed seeking following relief:-

“(I) Issue, a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned revisional order dt. 10.07.25 passed by respondent no. 1 and impugned order dt. 28.05.25 passed by respondent no. 4 (Annexure No. 1 & 2 to this writ petition respectively).

(II) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 4 to cancel the lease deed dt. 15.02.23 as per provisions of section 104 of the code and Rule 103 of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules 2016.”

3. Brief facts of the case are that an advertisement was issued on 28.06.2023 for allotment of Retail Outlet Dealership of Indian Oil Corporation. Along with petitioner, respondent no. 6 was also one of the applicant. In terms of advertisement, respondent no. 6 has produced required lease deed of land executed by respondent no. 5 f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top