ROHIT ARYA
Munnawar – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
Rohit Arya, J.
1. Both Mis. Cr. Cases Nos. 2206/2021 and 2213/2021 arise out of common order passed by First Additional Sessions Judge, Indore dismissing their bail application.
As both the cases arise out of common order, they are being disposed of by this singular order.
For the sake of convenience, the facts of Mis. Cr. Case No. 2206/2021 have been considered.
This is the first bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., for grant of bail filed on behalf of the applicant. The applicant is in custody since 01/01/2021 in connection with crime No. 02/2021 registered at Police Station Tukoganj, Indore, District Indore for the offence punishable under sections 295A, 298, 269 and 188/34 IPC.
2. As per prosecution case, the complainant Eklavya Singh Gaud has filed a written complaint and based on the same, offence punishable under sections 295A, 298, 269, 188/34 IPC was registered against Sadakat Khan, Edwin Anthony, Prakhar Vyas, Priyam Vyas, Nalin Yadav (organizer of the show), and Munnawar Faruqui. The complainant in the complaint has alleged in the complaint that he is custodian of Hindu Protection Congregation (Sanghatan). On 01/01/20201(sic), a standup comedy show was organi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.