SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 64

VIVEK RUSIA
Pavitra – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : P.R. Bhatnagar, Learned Counsel

ORDER :

Vivek Rusia, J.

1. Petitioners/plaintiffs have filed the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India being aggrieved by the order dated 10.11.2020 passed by Civil Judge, Class-I, Bhanpura, district Mandsaur whereby application under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 of the CPC has been dismissed and thereafter Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Order 43 Rule 1 CPC has also been dismissed vide order dated 22.12.2020 by Additional District Judge, Bhanpura, district Mandsaur.

Facts of the case in short are as under:

2. Plaintiffs filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction along with an application under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC. According to the plaintiffs, from north side of their land there is a crossing and public road which was being using from the period of their ancestors i.e. 200 years uninterruptedly without any hindrance, peacefully etc. They are using this public place to reach their houses by way of four wheeler and they have acquired the easementary right. According to the plaintiffs, the defendants i.e. Sree Laxminath Mandir Management Committee have started encroaching the public road by constructing a boundary wall. They have constructed a boundary wal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top