SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 241

SUJOY PAUL, SHAILENDRA SHUKLA
Ratan – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Santosh Kumar Meena, Learned Counsel.
For the Respondents: Mamta Shandilya, Learned Counsel.

JUDGMENT :

Shailendra Shukla, J.

1. The appellant has filed the appeal under Section 374 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 being aggrieved by judgment dated 06.04.2010 of conviction and sentence pronounced by First Additional Sessions Judge, Jhabua, in Session Trial No. 227/2009, wherein the appellant has been convicted as under:-

Conviction

Sentence

Section & Act

Imprisonment

Fine Amount

Imprisonment in lieu of fine

148 IPC

One year RI

 

 

302/149 IPC

Life Imprisonment

Rs.200/-

15 days RI

25(1)(B) Arms Act.

One year RI

Rs.200/-

15 days RI

2. Precisely speaking, the prosecution story in short was that on 16.04.2009, FIR was lodged by complainant Manjubai in Police-Station Kalidevi, Jhabua at about 10:25 pm to the effect that she along with her son Kalu (deceased) and her daughter-in-law Geetabai had gone to the house of co-accused Ramchand in the evening seeking return of loan amount of Rs. 10,000/- given to him by Kalu. However, Ramchand hurled filthy abuses at them and thereafter called out other co-accused persons. Subsequently, co-acc

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top