IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BENCH
Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia, J.
Narayani Bai Kushwaha – Appellant
Versus
State of MP and Ors. – Respondents
WP 3629 of 2021
Decided On : 24-02-2021
Medical Termination of Pregnancy - Minor Daughter - Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, Section 3, Section 5(1) - The court allowed the medical termination of pregnancy for a 12-year-old minor daughter who was pregnant as a result of rape, citing the provisions of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, particularly Section 3 and Section 5(1). The court relied on the interpretation of the Act to consider the risk to the life and health of the pregnant minor girl and the trauma she had suffered, ultimately allowing the termination of pregnancy.
Fact of the Case:
The petition sought permission for the medical termination of pregnancy for the petitioner's minor daughter, who was pregnant as a result of rape. The minor daughter, aged about 12 years, was found to be pregnant, and her pregnancy was deemed detrimental to her health.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the pregnancy posed a life-threatening risk to the minor girl and that she would suffer social stigma throughout her life. The court also considered the trauma the girl had suffered due to the rape and the agony she was going through, ultimately allowing the medical termination of pregnancy.
Issues: The main issue was whether the court should allow the medical termination of pregnancy for a 12-year-old minor daughter who was pregnant as a result of rape, considering the provisions of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the interpretation of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, particularly Section 3 and Section 5(1), which allowed for the termination of pregnancy if it posed a risk to the life or health of the pregnant woman, or if the pregnancy resulted from rape.
Final Decision: The court allowed the medical termination of pregnancy for the minor daughter and directed the respondents to medically terminate the pregnancy in a super-specialty institute, with the petitioner undertaking not to take any action against the doctors involved in the process. The court also directed the preservation of the fetus's DNA and postoperative care for the girl.
JUDGMENT :
Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia, J.
1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed seeking permission for medical termination of pregnancy on the ground that the minor daughter of the petitioner was subjected to rape. Crime No. 525/2020 has been registered at Police Station Dharnavada, District Guna and the accused is behind the bars. However, her minor daughter aged about 12 years is pregnant and her pregnancy is detrimental to her health.
2. This Court by order dated 17/02/2021 had directed the CMHO, Guna to constitute a Medical Board including a Gynecologist within a period of two days to submit a report as to whether the termination of pregnancy of the daughter of the petitioner is possible or not. Furthermore, the counsel for the State was also directed to requisition the Case Diary.
3. Today, vide Document No. 2272/2021, the State has filed the report of CMHO, Guna along with the opinion of the Medical Board, which is reproduced as under :-
4. It is submitted by the Counsel for the State that the prosecutrix is minor, aged about 12 years and she went missing on 10/10/2020 and was recovered on 12/01/2021 and as per the school certificate, her date of birth is 25/07/2006.
5. Considered the submissions regarding Medical Termination of Pregnancy.
6. The relevant statutory provisions, i.e. Sections 3 and 5(1) of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act reads as under:-
(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), a registered medical practitioner shall not be guilty of any offence under that Code or under any other law for the time being in force, if any pregnancy is terminated by him in accordance with the provisions of this Act.
(2) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (4), a pregnancy may be terminated by a registered medical practitioner,-
(a) where the length of the pregnancy does not exceed twelve weeks if such medical practitioner is, or
(b) where the length of the pregnancy exceeds twelve weeks but does not exceed twenty weeks, if not less than two registered medical practitioners are. Of opinion, formed in good faith, that,-
(i) the continuance
The central legal point established in the judgment is the application of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, and the consideration of the physical and mental health risks to the pregnant....
Termination of pregnancy in minors requires careful consideration of health risks and emotional trauma, recognizing the need for judicial permission under statute.
The court ruled that a minor victim of rape may have her pregnancy terminated under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, if it poses a grave risk to her mental health.
The court's decision emphasized the importance of considering the mental and physical well-being of the victim in allowing the termination of pregnancy beyond the statutory limit.
The Court reiterated that the rights of minor victims of sexual assault must be balanced with welfare considerations in matters of pregnancy termination under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act....
The right to terminate a pregnancy under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act is upheld as fundamental to the autonomy and dignity of a minor rape victim, despite gestational limits.
The judgment establishes the right of a rape victim to terminate pregnancy based on the risk to her life and mental health, as provided in the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.