SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 346

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
G. S. Ahluwalia, J.
Narayani Bai Kushwaha (Smt.) v. State of M.P.
Writ Petition No. 3629 of 2021 (G); Decided on 24.2.2021

Advocates:
Rajnish Sharma for petitioner; Deepak Khot, Government Advocate for respondents/State.

Headnote:

Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 -- Ss. 3 and 5 permission for medical termination of pregnancy -- her minor aged 12 years subjected to rape -- pregnant -- pregnancy detrimental to her health -- considering age of girl, trauma, agony and medical report of Medical Board, prayer made by petitioner allowed -- after termination of pregnancy, State of Madhya Pradesh shall ensure postoperative of girl (prosecutrix) -- Doctors who will be part of process shall have immunity in event of any litigation. Writ Petition (Civil) No. 749 of 2017 decided on 6.9.2017 (SC) followed. 2018 SCC online Bom. 11 relied on. [Paras 9, 15 & 17

xÒZ dk fpfdRlh; lekiu vfèkfu;e] 1971 && èkkjk 3 rFkk 5 && xÒZ d¢ fpfdRlh; lekiu d¢ fy, vuqKk && 12 o"kÊ; vçkIro; ls cykRlax gqvk xÒZorh && xÒZ mld¢ LokLF; d¢ fy, gkfudkjd && ckfydk dh vk;q && lnek] O;Fkk v©j fpfdRlk c¨MZ dh LokLF; fji¨VZ ij fopkj djrs gq, ;kph dh çkFkZuk eatwj && xÒZ d¢ lekiu d¢ i'pkr~ eè; çns'k jkT; }kjk ckfydk ¼vfÒ;¨D=h½ dh 'kY;fpfdRlk d¢ i'pkr~ dh ns[kÒky lqfuf'pr dh tk, && t¨ fpfdRld çfØ;k esa Òkx ysaxs og eqdnesckth dh n'kk esa mUeqä jgsaxsA fjV ;kfpdk ¼flfoy½ Ø- 749 lu~ 2017 fu.kÊr fnukad 6-9-2017 ¼mPpre U;k-½ vuqlfjrA 2018 ,l lh lh vkWuykbu cacà 11 voyafcrA ¼iSjk 9] 15 ,oa 17

ORDER

1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed seeking permission for medical termination of pregnancy on the ground that the minor daughter of the petitioner was subjected to rape. Crime No.525/2020 has been registered at Police Station Dharnavada, District Guna and the accused is behind the bars. However, her minor daughter aged about 12 years is pregnant and her pregnancy is detrimental to her health.

2. This Court by order dated 17.2.2021 had directed the CMHO, Guna to constitute a Medical Board including a Gynecologist within a period of two days to submit a report as to whether the termination of pregnancy of the daughter of the petitioner is possible or not. Furthermore, the counsel for the State was also directed to requisition the Case Diary.

3. Today, vide Document No.2272/2021, the State has filed the report of CMHO, Guna along with the opinion of the Medical Board, which is reproduced as under :-

izfr]
Jheku flfoy ltZu egkns;]
ftyk fpfdRlky;] xquk ¼e-iz-½
lnaHkZ%& dzekda@esMhdy cksMZ@2021@xquk fnukda 18-2-21 ¼
In Reference to eq-fp- ,oa Lok- vf/kdkjh i=½
fo"k; %& ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; ds fjV~ fiVh’ku Øekad 3629@2021 vkns’k fnukad 17-2-2021 ds ikyu esa Fkkuk /kjukonk ds vijk/k Øekad 525@2020 dh ihfMr+k 12 o"khZ; euh"kk dq’kokg iq=h ukjk;.kh ckbZ dq’kokg dh xHkZikr ds lcaèk esa fuf’pr tk¡p fd, tkus ckor~A
ekuuh; egkns;]
mijksDr lnafHkZr i= ds fo"k; esa euh"kk dq’kokg 12 o"khZ; iq=h ukjk;.kh dq’kokg ds xHkZikr ds laca/k esa vfHker izLrqr gSA
1- miyC/k nLrkostksa o ijh{k.k mijkra 12 o"khZ; euh"kk dq’kokg vfr ukckfyx o vifjiDr yM+dh gS ftls 18 lIrkg 4 fnu dk
(USG Report ftldh izfrfyfi layXu gS o ijh{k.k ds vuqlkj½ xHkZ gSA dkuwuh MTP Act. ds vuqlkj 20 lIrkg rd xHkZikr dh vof/k gksrh gSA vr% ;g xHkZikr dh lhek esa vkrk gSA xHkZikr o izlo nksuksa gh bl voLFkk dh yM+dh ds fy;s tfVyrk o xaHkhjrk fy, gks ldrh gSA vr% xHkZikr fd;k tkuk mfpr gksxkA
2- mDr yM+dh ds tuukax vifjiDo gS iwoZ fodflr ugha gS ¼tSls lfoZDl vR;ra NksVh gS½ bl fLFkfr esa xHkZikr
procedure high risk o High Morbidity fy, gSA vr% yM+dh dk xHkZikr procedure mPpre laLFkku ¼esfMdy dkWyst½ es Skilled Management o Continious Monitoring esa 20 lIrkg gS ls iwoZ fd;s tkus dk vfHker gSA vr% OPD Ticket o jsQj fd, tkus dh lgefr ds lkFk izfrfyfi layXu gSA 3- bl yM+dh dk dsl ijh{k.k 15 LkIrkg 4 fnu xHkZ ij 28-1-2021 dks L=hjksx fo’ks"kK dks bl gsrq lacaf/kr procedure Medical College esa djk;s tkus ds fy, Refer dk vfHker fn;k tk pqdk gSA ijh{k.k vfHker dh izfrfyfi layXu gSA layXu izfrfyfi %&
1- ;w- ,l-th fjiksVZ
2- vks-ih-Mh- fVfdV o jsQj daluZV
3- iwoZ ijh{k.k vfHker i=
fnukad 18-2-2021

gLrk{kj

gLrk{kj

gLrk{kj

MkW- 'kkjnk Hkksyk

MkW- vkjk/kuk fot;oxhZ;

MkW- m"kk pkSjfl;k

fu’psruk fo’ks"kKk

L=hjksx fo’ks"kK

L=h jksx fo’ks"kK

ft-fp- xquk

ft-fp-xquk

ft-fp- xquk

4. It is submitted by the Counsel for the State that the prosecutrix is minor, aged about 12 years and she went missing on 10.10.2020 and was recovered on 12.1.2021 and as per the school certificate, her date of birth is 25.7.2006.

5. Considered the submissions regarding Medical Termination of Pregnancy.

6. The relevant statutory provisions, i.e. sections 3 and 5 (1) of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act reads as under :-

“3. When Pregnancies may be terminated by registered medical practitioners.--

(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), a registered medical practitioner shall not be guilty of any offence under that Code or under any other law for the time being in force, if any pregnancy is terminated by him in accordance with the provisions of this Act.

(2) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (4), a pregnancy may be terminated by a registered medical practitioner,-

(a) where the length of the pregnancy does not exceed twelve weeks if s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top