JUDGMENT :

Vishal Mishra, J.

1. With the consent of parties, the matter is finally heard.

2. The present petition has been filed being aggrieved by the orders dated 10.2.2020 passed by respondent no. 2 in Case No. 0119/2019-20/Appeal, whereby, the order dated 18.7.2019 passed by respondent No. 3 has been affirmed. The petitioner is further aggrieved by the order dated 19.5.2017 passed by respondent No. 4 in Case No. 54/15-16/A-6 whereby, the respondent no. 4 has passed an order for registering the mutation in the name of respondent no. 5 in place of late Badri Singh. The challenge is made on the ground that late Badri Singh has executed a will in favour of the petitioner and on the basis of the will, the petitioner has filed an application on 25.7.2016 for getting his name mutated in the revenue record before learned Tehsildar. After death of Badri Prasad who expired on 25.5.2016, respondent no. 5 filed an objection before learned Tehsildar and has denied execution of the will in question. The learned Tehsildar has got recorded the statement of witnesses of the will and has got it certified. Respondent No. 5 was afforded opportunity for recording his statement but he has denied for th