SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 406

G.S.AHLUWALIA
Dilip Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Anurag Saxena for petitioner;
G.K. Agrawal, Government Advocate for respondent/State.

ORDER

1. This miscellaneous petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India has been filed against the order dated 2.1.2021 passed by Additional Commissioner, Bhopal Division, Bhopal in Case No. 209/Appeal/2016-17, order dated 10.3.2017 passed by SDO, Vidisha, District Vidisha in Case No.76/Appeal/2015-16 and order dated 17.2.2016 passed by Tahsildar, Vidisha, District Vidisha in Case No.137/A-6/2014-15, by which the application filed by the petitioner for mutation of his name on the basis of ‘’Will’’ has been rejected.

2. The necessary facts for disposal of present petition in short are that Smt. Lalta Bai widow of Phool Singh Yadav was the owner of survey No.505 min area 0.044 hectare, survey No. 559, area 0.052 hectare and survey No.558, area 0.052 hectare, total area 0.148 hectare situated in Tahsil and District Vidisha.

3. It is the case of the petitioner that his mother was residing with him and she expired on 2.5.2015 and her last rites were performed by the petitioner as per Hindu rites and rituals. The mother of the petitioner, namely, Smt. Lalta Bai had executed a ‘’Will’’ by getting it notarized on 20.11.2011, according to which the above-mentioned property was bequeat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top