Bharat Singh Yadav vs State of Madhya Pradesh

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(MP) 291

SHEEL NAGU, ANAND PATHAK
Bharat Singh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : S.K. Sharma, Learned Counsel
For the Respondent:Ankur Modi, Learned Additional Advocate General and Aok Kumar Sharma, Learned Counsel

JUDGMENT :

Anand Pathak, J.

1. The instant appeal under Section 2 of the Madhya Pradesh Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyaypeeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005 has been preferred by the appellant against the order dated 06.01.2021 passed in Writ Petition No. 20116/2020, whereby petition preferred by the petitioner has been dismissed.

2. Precisely stated facts of the case are that the appellant/petitioner was working as Panchayat Secretary at the relevant point of time at Gram Panchayat Takpraroriya, District Guna and by order dated 08.12.2020 passed by the Director, Panchayat Raj Sanchalnalay, Bhopal (herein respondent No. 2), appellant/petitioner has been transferred from Gram Panchayat Takpraroriya District Guna to District Rajgarh and being crestfallen by the same, petitioner filed a petition bearing Writ Petition No. 20116/2020 before this court on the ground that the impugned order has been passed in colourable exercise of power and same is arbitrary and illegal.

3. The learned writ court vide impugned order dated 06.01.2021 rejected the contentions so advanced by the petitioner and dismissed the petition accordingly.

4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that after enac

Click Here to Read the rest of this document