IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BENCH
Sheel Nagu, Anand Pathak, JJ.
Bharat Singh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors. – Respondents
Writ Appeal No. 31 of 2021
Decided On : 27-02-2021
TRANSFER - PANCHAYAT SECRETARY - Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Service (Gram Panchayat Secretary Recruitment and Condition of Service) Rules of 2011 - Rule 6(7), Rule 8 - The court discussed the statutory rules governing the transfer of Gram Panchayat Secretary, emphasizing the district-level cadre and the appointing authority. The court held that the rules prevail over executive instructions or circulars, and set aside the transfer order based on the statutory provisions.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant, a Panchayat Secretary, was transferred from one district to another, challenging the transfer as arbitrary and illegal. The writ court dismissed the petition, leading to the appeal.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the transfer of the appellant from one district to another was contrary to the statutory rules governing the transfer of Gram Panchayat Secretary, emphasizing the district-level cadre and the appointing authority.
Issues: The main issue was whether the transfer of the appellant from one district to another district was in accordance with the statutory rules governing the transfer of Gram Panchayat Secretary.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Service (Gram Panchayat Secretary Recruitment and Condition of Service) Rules of 2011 prevail in respect of service conditions of Gram Panchayat Secretary, especially regarding transfer, over any executive instruction or circular.
Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, and the order of the writ court as well as the impugned transfer order were set aside. The appellant was allowed to continue at his present place of posting, with the respondents having the liberty to transfer the appellant as per law within the district, if they desire so.
JUDGMENT :
Anand Pathak, J.
1. The instant appeal under Section 2 of the Madhya Pradesh Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyaypeeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005 has been preferred by the appellant against the order dated 06.01.2021 passed in Writ Petition No. 20116/2020, whereby petition preferred by the petitioner has been dismissed.
2. Precisely stated facts of the case are that the appellant/petitioner was working as Panchayat Secretary at the relevant point of time at Gram Panchayat Takpraroriya, District Guna and by order dated 08.12.2020 passed by the Director, Panchayat Raj Sanchalnalay, Bhopal (herein respondent No. 2), appellant/petitioner has been transferred from Gram Panchayat Takpraroriya District Guna to District Rajgarh and being crestfallen by the same, petitioner filed a petition bearing Writ Petition No. 20116/2020 before this court on the ground that the impugned order has been passed in colourable exercise of power and same is arbitrary and illegal.
3. The learned writ court vide impugned order dated 06.01.2021 rejected the contentions so advanced by the petitioner and dismissed the petition accordingly.
4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that after enactment of Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Service (Gram Panchayat Secretary Recruitment and Condition of Service) Rules of 2011, under Rule 6(7), it has been categorically stipulated that Gram Panchayat secretary may be transferred on administrative ground or on the basis of his application within the districts in accordance with transfer policy issued by the Commissioner Panchayat Raj. Since cadre of Gram Panchayat secretary is district-wise and seniority is maintained accordingly, therefore, transfer of present appellant from District Guna to District Rajgarh is contrary to the said statutory rules, therefore, transfer order is illegal.
5. On 18.01.2021, this court asked the Additional Advocate General to seek instructions in respect of grounds of violation of Rule 6(7) of Rules, 2011 and after seeking instructions, learned Additional Advocate General referred the Rules of 2011 as well as circular dated 25.06.2019 issued by the Commissioner Panchayat Raj Directorate. According to him, said circular dated 25.06.2019 stipulates that transfer of Panchayat Secretary can be given effect from one district to another district after ratification of departmental minister concerned. Therefore, as per said policy, appellant can be transferred from one district to another district, therefore, he prayed for dismissal of this appeal.
6. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents appended thereto.
7. It is the case of appellant that as per Rule 6(7) of Rules, 2011, appellant cannot be transferred out of district. Rules 6(7) and 8 of Rules 2011 is reproduced for ready reference:-
(1) to (6) ....
(7) The Gram Panchayat Secretary may be transferred on administrative ground or on the basis of his application within the district in accordance with the transfer policy issued by the Commissioner Panchayat Raj. The Gram Panchayat Secretary may be transferred, if necessary, after proper enquiry of the complaints on the recommendation of the chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat.
(8) The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat shall publish the seniority list of Gram Panchayat Secretary working in the district as on 1st of April every year. The consolidated seniority list order shall be issued separately."
8. After perusal of sub-rules 7 and 8 of Rule 6 reveals that Panchayat Secretary is a district level cadre and appointing authority as per Section 3(b) with respect to Gram Panchayat Secretary is Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat and definition of Gram Panchayat Secretary as contained in Section 3(d) stipulates such person appointed by the Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat. This legal position is further reflected in Rule 5 (method of absorption and selection), therefore, appointing authority of Panchayat Secretary is C
The main legal point established in the judgment is that statutory rules prevail over executive instructions or circulars in determining the service conditions of government employees.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the permissibility of transferring the petitioner under Rule 6(7) of the Rules of 2011 and the absence of a mandatory requirement for approval f....
Transfer of Panchayat Secretary must adhere to statutory processes under applicable rules, mandating review by the appropriate authority upon challenge.
The court emphasized the importance of fulfilling the twin pre-requirements of public interest and administrative exigencies for transfers, and highlighted the significance of adhering to the Transfe....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the mandatory nature of Rule 15(j) of the M.P. Jila Panchayat (Business) Rules, 1998 and the significance of compliance with Rule 3(b), (d) and 6(7....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.