ANJULI PALO
Shankar Bhosle – Appellant
Versus
Damji Pawar – Respondent
ORDER :
Anjuli Palo, J.
1. This revision is preferred against the order dated 03.07.2020 passed in Case No. 0002A/90(7)/2019-20 by the Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) Betul whereby the application preferred by the respondent under Section 23E has been allowed and the applicant herein Shankar Bhosle has been directed to pay rent of the suit accommodation for a period of 36 months i.e. Rs.43,200/- and he shall also handover the vacant possession of the suit accommodation to the respondent Damji Pawar.
2. Previously, the respondent had filed an application under Section 23 of the M.P. Accommodation Control Act, which was dismissed, thereafter again he filed an application under Section 23A of the M.P. Accommodation Control Act claiming that he is the owner of the land bearing Khasra No. 287/2 area 0.66 hectare in which the present appellant is still residing as his tenant since long from the time of his father. In October, 1973, the father of the present appellant had taken the house on rent at the rate of Rs. 10/- per month. Time to time rent was increased upto Rs. 1200/- per month. In the year 1984, the father of the respondent died still father of the present appellant paid monthly r
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.