SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(MP) 1085

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Sanjay Yadav, Ag. CJ and Sujoy Paul, J.
Arif Masood v. State of M. P.
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 45501of 2020 (Jabalpur); Decided on 27.11.2020

Advocates:
Vivek K. Tankha with Ajay Gupta for applicant; Purushendra Kaurav, Advocate General with Pushpendra Yadav, Additional Advocate General for respondent/State.

Headnote:

(1) Criminal P.C. 1973 -- S. 154 -- two FIRs arising from same incident -- there can be nosecond FIR in respect of same occurrence or incident giving rise tomore than one cognizable offences. (2001) 6 SCC 181, (2013) 6 SCC 348 and (2013) 6 SCC 384 followed. (2018) 4 SCC 579 distinguished. (2004) 13 SCC 292 and (2013) 5 SCC 148 referred to. [Para 17]

(2) Criminal P.C. 1973 -- S. 438-- anticipatory bail -- applicant absconding -- proclamation u/s. 82 not issued -- anticipatory bail cannot be denied on ground that applicant is absconding. (2012) 8 SCC 730 and 2014(1) JLJ 365 followed. M. Cr. C. No. 9567-9568 of 2014 decided on 9.7.2014 and M. Cr. C. No.13420 of 2014 decided on 22.9.2014 relied on. M. Cr. C. No. 6405 of 2016 decided on 25.4.2016 dissented from. M. Cr. C. No. 4357 of 2017 decided on 2.5.2017 referred to. [Paras 21 & 23]

(3) Criminal P.C. 1973 -- S. 438 -- Penal Code, 1860 -- S. 153A -portion of speech cannot be divorced from complete text -- nor it can be read in isolation -- applicant delivered speech and expressedhis views, which is certainly his valuable fundamental right -- considering nature and gravity of accusation, role of applicant, false text of second FIR and its prima facie maintainability, this is a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. (2011) 1 SCC 694 and 1995 MPLJ 296 : 1995 JLJ -- (FB) followed. 1975 (Supp.) SCC 1, (1980) 2 SCC 565, (2012) 1 SCC 40, 1998 (2) MLJ 932 and M. Cr. C. No. 7810 of 2012 referred to. [Paras 25 & 27]

¼1½ naM ÁfØ;k lafgrk] 1973 & /kkjk 154 & ,d gh ?kVuk ls nks ÁFke bfÙkyk fjiksVZ mn~Hkwr & ,d gh ?kVuk ds laca/k esa vFkok ,d ls vf/kd laKs; vijk/kksa dks mRiUu djus okyh ?kVuk ds laca/k esa f}rh; ÁFke bfÙkyk fjiksVZ ugha gks ldrhA ¼2001½ 6 ,l lh lh 181] ¼2013½ 6 ,l lh lh 348 rFkk ¼2013½ 6 ,l lh lh 384 vuqlfjrA ¼2018½ 4 ,l lh lh 579 ÁHksfnrA ¼2004½ 13 ,l lh lh 292 rFkk ¼2013½ 5 ,l lh lh 148 fufnZ"VA ¼iSjk 17½
¼2½ naM ÁfØ;k lafgrk] 1973 & /kkjk 438 & vfxze tekur & vkosnd Qjkj & /kkjk 82 ds v/khu mn~?kks"k.kk tkjh ugha & vfxze tekur bl vk/kkj ij ukeatwj ugha dh tk ldrh fd vkosnd Qjkj gSA ¼2012½ 8 ,l lh lh 730 rFkk 2014 ¼1½ ts ,y ts 365 vuqlfjrA Ádh.kZ nkafMd ekeyk Øekad 9567&9568 lu~ 2014 fu.khZr fnukad 9-7-2014 rFkk Ádh.kZ nkafMd ekeyk Øekad 13420 lu~ 2014 fu.khZr fnukad 22-9-2014 voyafcrA Ádh.kZ nkafMd ekeyk Øekad 6405 lu~ 2016 fu.khZr fnukad 25-4-2016 folEerA Ádh.kZ nkafMd ekeyk Øekad 4357 lu~ 2017 fu.khZr fnukad 2-5-2017 fufnZ"VA ¼iSjk 21 ,oa 23½
¼3½ naM ÁfØ;k lafgrk] 1973 & /kkjk 438 & naM lafgrk] 1860 & èkkjk 153d & Hkk"k.k dk ,d va'k laiw.kZ ikB ls foPNsfnr ugha fd;k tk ldrk & u gh mls i`Fkdr% i<+k tk ldrk gS & vkosnd us Hkk"k.k fn;k vkSj viuh jk; vfHkO;Dr dh] tks fuf'pr :i ls mldk ewY;oku ewy vf/kdkj gS & vfHk;ksx dh ÁÑfr vkSj xaHkhjrk] vkosnd dh Hkwfedk] f}rh; ÁFke bfÙkyk fjiksVZ dh feF;k fo"k;oLrq vkSj ÁFken`"V~; mlds pykus ;ksX; gksus ij fopkj djrs gq,] ;g vfxze tekur eatwj fd, tkus gsrq mi;qZDr ekeyk gSA ¼2011½ 1 ,l lh lh 694 rFkk 1995 ts ,y ts 21 ¼iw.kZ U;k;ihB½ vuqlfjrA 1975 ¼lIyhŒ½ ,l lh lh 1] ¼1980½ 2 ,l lh lh 565] ¼2012½ 1 ,l lh lh 40] 1998 ¼2½ ,e ,y ts 932 rFkk Ádh.kZ nkafMd ekeyk Øekad 7810 lu~ 2012 fufnZ"VA ¼iSjk 25 ,oa 27½

ORDER

Paul, J -- 1. The applicant has filed this application under section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1908 (for short CrPC) for grant of anticipatory bail arising out of Crime No. 857/20 registered at Police Station, Talaiya, District Bhopal relating to offence under section 153A of Indian Penal Code (IPC).

2. Draped in brevity, the case of applicant is that he is an Advocate, active politician and elected member of legislative assembly from Bhopal. On 29.10.2020, a protest was organized at Iqbal Maidan, Bhopal against the comments made by President of French Republic in reference to Islam. The applicant being an elected representative of his constituency also addressed the gathering and expressed his opinion on the comments of French President and condemned the comments made by him. The applicant also appealed the protesters to live with peace and harmony in society and not get instigated on the comments made by the President of France. The applicant also referred about the certain old incidence which had relation with patriotism and freedom movement of the country.

3. In the aforesaid gathering dated 29.10.2020, the police force was present at the spot to oversee the agitation. An FIR No.852/20 (first FIR) dated 29.10.2020 was registered against the applicant and other co-accused persons for committing offence under section 188 of IPC. Subsequently, section 269 and 270 of IPC and 51B of Disaster Management Act, 2005 were added by the police. It is pointed out that in the first FIR (Annexure A/2) there was no mention regarding any speech given by present applicant which attracts section 153A of IPC.

4. After six days from the date first FIR was lodged, Dr. Deepak Raghuwanshi (complainant) claiming himself to be General Secretary of Dharam Sanskriti Samiti preferred a complaint which was reduced in writing as FIR on 4.11.2020 (second FIR) (Annexure A/3). This FIR No.857/20 is filed as Annexure A/3. It is averred that second FIR does not mention about the previous FIR.

5. Shri Vivek K. Tankha, learned senior counsel assisted by Shri Ajay Gupta, Advocate for the applicant urged that the first FIR was lodged by Sub Inspector Shiv Bhanu Singh who was present at the time of protest. As per the contents of first FIR, approximately 2,000 persons participated in the protest against the statement of President of France. These persons have not maintained social distancing and further violated the order passed under section 144 of CrPC thereby committed offence under section 188 of IPC. In the second FIR, following averments were made:

^^vkfjQ elwn o muds lkFkh lkoj ealwjh] vdhy my jgeku ubZe [kku] eksŒ lkykj] bdjke gklHkh] vCnqy ubZe }kjk bdcky eSnku esa jk"Vª fojks/kh vksr&Áksr Hkk"k.k nsdj oxZ oSeuLrk mUekn QSykus ds Á;Ru ds laca/k esa egksn; fuosnu gS dh eSa /keZ laLÑfr lfefr ds egkea=h in ij Hkksiky ls gw¡ fnukad 29-10-2020 dks bdcky eSnku ryS;k Hkksiky nksigj esa Hkksiky e/; {ks= ds fo/kk;d Jh vkfjQ elwn ds usr`Ro esa gtkjksa yksxksa us Án'kZu dj Ýkal ds jk"Vªifr dk iqryk ngu fd;k x;k mlh nkSjku mUeknh Hkk"k.k nsdj viekutud Hkk"k.k fn;k x;k rFkk ;g dgk¡ x;k dh Ýkal ds jk"Vªifr ds dk;Z dks Hkkjr esa cSBh fgUnw oknh ljdkj lgefr ns jgh gS rFkk e/; Áns'k esa cSBh fgUnw oknh ljdkj eqfLye oxZ ds vieku dks lg ns jgh gSA vr% fganqLrku dh dsUæ o jkT; ljdkj dku [kksydj lqu ys ;fn Ýkal ds mDr ÑR; dk fojks/k ugha fd;k x;k rks fgUnqLrku esa Hkh bZV ls bZV cktk nsaxs mlds }kj fn;s x, Hkk"k.k esa Hkkjr ljdkj ds ,d ea=h dk mYys[k Hkh fd;k x;k gS ftlls fgUnw oxZ vkØks'k iSnk gqvk gS ,oa Hkkjr rFkk Ýkal ls tks eS=h iw.kZ laca/k gS ml ij Hkh xyr ÁHkko iM+us dh laHkkouk gS eè; {ks= ds fo/kk;d ds lkFk muds lkFkh yksx }kjk dsUæ o jkT; ljdkj ij vHkæ Hkk"kk esa vkjksi yxk, x, ftlls Áns'k ds lHkh oxZ /keZ tkrh Hkk"kkbZ o Áknsf'kd lewg }kjk fof/kor fuokZfpr ljdkj o oxZ ij vk?kkr yxk gS Hkkjr dk lafoèkku /keZ fujis{k gS ,sls esa feF;k :i ls nks"kkjksi.k dj fgUnw oknh ljdkj dk BIik yxk;k tkuk iw.kZr% xyr gS vr% /keZ laLÑfr bl Ádkj ds ÑR; djus okyksa ds

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top