IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
G. S. Ahluwalia, J.
Rakesh Singh Bhadoriya v. Union of India & Others
Writ Petition No. 8593 of 2013 (Gwalior); Decided on 3.9.2020
(1) Constitution of India -- Art. 226 -- Guidelines for Selection on Regular LPG Distributorship, 2011 -- Cl. 7.1. ii -- allotment of distributorship of LPG -- GP category -- ex-Army man -- eligibility -- graduation certificate issued by Indian Army -- duly recognized by Association of Indian Universities -- equivalent to graduation as per notification of Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions -- Directorate General Resettlement issued eligibility certificate certifying that petitioner is eligible for allotment of LPG distributorship -- held -- any candidate who possesses equivalent qualification recognized by Ministry of HRD, Government of India as on date of application, is treated to be holding educational qualification mentioned in sub-clauses (a) to (e) of clause 7.1.ii of Guidelines -- graduation certificate issued by Indian Army cannot be confined to recruitment of exArmy man on Class-C post only -- respondents directed to reconsider educational qualification of the petitioner. AIR 1962 SC 1893 and (1979) 4 SCC 429 followed. 2018 (1) JLJ 200 (SC), Writ-C No. 60706 of 2014 decided on 19.11.2014 (All.-DB) and CWP No. 13263 of 2016 (O&M) (P&H) referred to. [Para 12, 14 & 18
(2) Interpretation of Statute -- interpretation of provision leads to absurdity or frustrates mandate of Arts.14 and 19 of Constitution -- must be avoided. (2009)1 SCC 540 followed. [Para 17
¼1½ Òkjr dk lafoèkku && vuq- 226 && fu;fer ,yihth forj.k d¢ p;u gsrq fn'kk&funsZ'k 2011 && [kaM 7-1 ii && ,yihth forj.k dk vkcaVu && thih çoxZ &&iwoZ lSfud && ik=rk && Òkjrh; lsuk }kjk tkjh fd;k x;k Lukrd çek.ki= && Òkjrh; fo'ofo|ky; laÄ }kjk lE;d~:is.k ekU;rkçkIr && dkfeZd] y¨d f'kdk;r v©j isU'ku ea=ky; }kjk tkjh vfèklwpuk d¢ vuqlkj Lukrd d¢ lerqY; && 'ks"k iquokZl egkfuns'kky; us çekf.kr djrs gq, ik=rk çek.ki= tkjh fd;k fd ;kph ,yihth forj.k d¢ vkcaVu d¢ fy, ik= gS && vfÒfuèkkZfjr && fdlh vH;FkÊ d¢ ikl vkosnu d¢ fnukad d¨ ekuo lalkèku fodkl ea=ky;] Òkjr ljdkj }kjk ekU;rkçkIr lerqY; vgZrk gS] r¨ mld¢ ikl fn'kk&funsZ'k¨a d¢ [kaM 7-1- ii d¢ mi[kaM ¼d½ ls ¼M+½ esa mfYyf[kr 'kSf{kd vgZrk g¨uk Òh ekuk tk,xk && Òkjrh; lsuk }kjk tkjh Lukrd çek.ki= d¢oy oxZ&x in ij iwoZ lSfud dh ÒrÊ rd lhfer ugÈ fd;k tk ldrk && çR;FkÊx.k d¨ ;kph dh && 'kSf{kd vgZrk ij iqufoZpkj djus dk funs'k fn;k x;kA , vkb vkj 1962 ,l lh 1893 rFkk ¼1979½ 4 ,l lh lh 429 vuqlfjrA 2018 ¼1½ ts ,y ts 200 ¼mPpre U;k-½] fjV&lh Ø- 60706 lu~ 2014 fu.kÊr fnukad 19-11-2014 ¼byk-&[kaM U;k;ihB½ rFkk lh MCY;w ih- Ø- 13263 lu~ 2016 ¼v¨ ,aM ,e½ ¼iatkc rFkk gfj-½ fufnZ"VA ¼iSjk 12] 14 ,oa 18
¼2½ fofèk dk fuoZpu && micaèk dk fuoZpu vuFkZ esa ifj.kr g¨rk gS ;k mlls Òkjr d¢ lafoèkku d¢ vuqPNsn 14] 19 dh vkKk O;FkZ g¨rh gS && mlls cpuk pkfg,A ¼2009½ 1 ,l lh lh 540 vuqlfjrA ¼iSjk 17
ORDER
1. Heard finally through video conferencing.
2. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed seeking the following reliefs :-
7.(i) The order impugned annexure P/1 may kindly be quashed.
(ii) Respondents may kindly be directed to allot the distributorship of LPG to the petitioner. Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case same may kindly be granted to the petitioner.''
3. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner is an Ex-Army man who had suffered gunshot injuries while he was posted at the Border. An advertisement was issued by the respondents on 22.4.2011 for awarding the Distributorship of LPG at Mehgaon, District Bhind for G.P. Category. It is submitted that the petitioner is having a graduation certificate issued by the Indian Army and this certificate is duly recognized by the Association of Indian Universities and as per the notification issued by the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions, the certificate issued by the Indian Army is having equivalence to graduation. There is a scheme with regard to allotment of oil products agency to the Defence Personnel. The petitioner was holding the post of Havaldar and had received a bullet injury while he was posted at the Border and the eligibility certificate has also been issued by the Directorate General Settlement. Copy of the battle casualty certificate has been filed as Annexure P11 and character certificate is Ex.P12. The application of the petitioner for allotment of Distributorship of LPG was rejected by the respondents by discarding his graduation certificate. Therefore, the petitioner filed a Writ Petition No. 424/2012, which was allowed and the respondents were directed to reconsider the educational qualification of the petitioner. Thereafter, the petitioner made a representation but the same has been dismissed by the impugned order. Accordingly, this petition has been filed, contending inter alia that the graduation certificate issued by the Indian Army fulfills the educational qualification as laid down in the guidelines for allotment of LPG Distributorship. It is further submitted that the Punjab & Haryana High Court by its order dated 18th February, 2020 passed in the case of Krishan Singh Yadav v. Union of India and Ors. in CWP No.13263 of 2016 (O & M) has held that the graduation certificate issued by the Indian Army is equivalent to Graduation/Degree awarded by any of the Universities incorporated by an Act of the Central or State Legislature in India or any other educational institutions established by an Act of Parliament or declared to be deemed as a University under the UGC Act, 1956, or possess an equivalent qualification recognized by the Ministry of HRD, Government of India and the present petition is duly covered by the said order.
4. Per contra, it is submitted by the counsel for the respondents/Indian Oil Corporation that so far as graduation certificate issued by the Indian Army is concerned, it is valid for appointment on Class-C post and is not valid for allotment of LPG Distributorship because the graduation certificate issued by the Indian Army cannot be treated at par with the educational qualification degree awarded by any of the Universities or any other educational institutions established by an Act of Parliament or declared to be deemed as a University under the UGC Act, 1956 and further, the graduation certificate issued by the Indian Army has not been recognized by the Ministry of HRD, Government of India. It is further submitted that the Division Bench of Allahabad High Court by order dated 19/11/2014 passed in Writ-C No.60706 of 2014 [Jai Vijay Singh vs. Union of India, through Secretary & Others] has held that graduation certificate issued by the Indian Army cannot be treated as an embodiment of an educational qualification awarded either by a University or by any other educational institution or by an entity declared to
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.