AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
AKC & SIG Joint Venture Firm – Appellant
Versus
Western Coalfields Ltd. – Respondent
ORDER :
Vijay Kumar Shukla, J.
1. The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging the order dated 08-05-2019, passed by the respondent no. 2, whereby the work order issued in favour of the petitioners has been terminated, security amount has been forfeited and the joint venture of the petitioners has been debarred from participation in tenders of the respondent Western Coalfields Limited (for short WCL) for a period of 12 months from the date of issuance of the impugned order dated 08-05-2019.
2. The necessary facts are that the petitioners were the successful bidder in the NIT No. 24/2014-15, issued by the respondent WCL in September, 2014. In pursuance thereof, a work order was issued to the petitioners on 08-12-2014 in their favour by the WCL. It is submitted that the petitioners had completed the work at an extremely fast pace in the initial period. According to the petitioners because of the hindrances created by the respondents and due to departmental failure, some delay occurred in the execution of the contract. The respondents also did not extend the period of execution of the contract.
3. Learned counsel for the respo
Alchemist Ltd. And another Vs. State Bank of Sikkim and others
Nawal Kishore Sharma Vs. Union of India and others (2014) 9 SCC 329
Kusum Ingots & Alloys Ltd. Vs. Union of India and another
State of Rajasthan and Others vs. M/s. Swaika Properties and Another
Union of India and others vs. Adani Exports Ltd. and another
A.B.C. Laminart (P) Limited Vs. A.P. Agencies, Salem
Angile Insulations Vs. Davy Ashmore India Ltd. and another (1995) 4 SCC 153
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.