Back
SANJAY YADAV, VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
M. P. Power Management Company Limited, Jabalpur – Appellant
Versus
Sky Power Southeast Solar India Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
ORDER :
Sanjay Yadav, J.
1. Review of order dated 27.02.2020 passed in Writ Petition No. 4205/2019 is being sought vide present petition.
2. The Writ petition was directed against the communication dated 07.07.2018; whereby, the Power Purchase Agreement dated 18.09.2015 was terminated, the reason being the failure in achieving condition subsequent as well as commissioning of the 50 mw Solar PV Project. It needs a mention that earlier by communication dated 11.08.2017 the said agreement was terminated. However, on its being challenged in Writ Petition No. 12880/2017, wherein, on the findings that the reasons assigned in the termination order were not germane to the facts and additional reasons came to fore during hearing, the order dated 11.08.2017 was set-aside with the liberty to pass fresh orders in terms of the Agreement. Armed with the said liberty fresh orders were passed on 07.07.2018.
3. It is not in dispute that the respondent is a Power Purchasing Company under the Electricity Act, 2003 and the petitioner is responsible for power procurement in the State of M.P. That in furtherance to the Solar Policy for encouraging generation of Power through Solar Power Projects an agreemen
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
