SUJOY PAUL, SHAILENDRA SHUKLA
Kan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
ORDER :
Sujoy Paul, J.
1. In these batch of petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, challenge is made to similar Notifications dated 04/10/2018 (Annexure P/3), 29/09/2018 (Annexure P/4) & 02/07/2020 (Annexure P/1) issued by Urban Development and Housing Department in exercise of power under Section 5(1)(B) of Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 (37 of 1961) (in short Municipalities Act), whereby Govt. included the areas of certain village panchayats as Municipal Council.
2. This Court by common order dated 21/10/2020 had set aside the impugned Notifications by reserving liberty to the State to follow the "due process" and proceed afresh.
3. Review Petitions No. 51 & 52 of 2021 were filed by the State seeking review of said common order dated 21/10/2020. The singular ground taken in the review petition was that a gazette Notification dated 27/11/2011 was filed by the State in aforesaid writ petitions but while passing the final order, the said Notification has not been taken into account. If Notification would have been taken into account, the fate of the matters would have been different. Since a relevant Notification which has a bearing on the issues involved has be
J.K. Cotton Spinning & Weaving Mills Co. Ltd. vs. State of U.P.
Champa Lal vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.
Shri Mohammad Alikhan vs. Commissioner of Wealth Tax
Dilwar Babu Kurane vs. State of Maharashtra
Ramphal Kundu vs. Kamal Sharma
Quebec Railway, Light, Heat & Power Co. v. Vandry
Union of India vs. Hansoli Devi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.