IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, RAJENDRA KUMAR-IV, JJ.
Sujit and others - Petitioners
Versus
State of U.P. and others - Respondents
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 26793 of 2022
Decided On : 27-09-2022
Constitution of India, 1950 – Article, 243, 243Q –U.P. Municipalities Act, 1916 – sub-section (2), 3 – U.P. Municipalities Act, 1916, Section 3, 4 – Here shall be constituted in every State, Panchayats at village, intermediate and district levels – petitioners are elected of Gram Panchayat – They have called in question notifications – Notification was a draft of a proposal intended to be issued by Governor in exercise of powers under clause of Article of Constitution of India, read with sub-section of U.P. Municipalities Act and in partial modification of previous notification and other notifications issued in this behalf for inclusion of ten villages in the transitional area of Panchayat – Draft proposal was notified in order to ensure compliance of Section of U.P. Municipalities Act – Held, In view of what has been stated above, we are of considered opinion that final notification in so far as it includes villages is illegal and unconstitutional and it is quashed to that extent – Although, notifications are also under challenge, but no argument has been advanced in respect thereto – Consequently, challenge to these notifications fail – Petition allowed.
JUDGMENT :
Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.
The petitioners are elected Pradhans of Gram Panchayat Bhaiswali, Sansaarpur, Sidhwapaar, Kodhari, Bailey and Kalyanpur. They have called in question notifications dated 12.12.2020, 22.7.2022 and 10.8.2022 (all issued by respondent No. 2).
2. The notification dated 12.12.2020 was a draft of a proposal intended to be issued by the Governor in exercise of powers under clause (2) of Article 243-Q of the Constitution of India, read with sub-section (2) of Section 3 of the U.P. Municipalities Act, 1916 and in partial modification of previous notification dated 16th March, 1875 and other notifications issued in this behalf for inclusion of ten villages in the transitional area of Nagar Panchayat, Badahalganj, Gorakhpur. The draft proposal was notified in order to ensure compliance of Section 4 of the U.P. Municipalities Act, 1916 which is as follows :
(2) The Governor shall, before issuing the notification consider any objection or suggestion in writing which it receives from any person, in respect of the draft within the period stated.''
3. Section 3 of the U.P. Municipalities Act, 1916, which is also relevant for deciding the controversy, reads as follows :
(2) The Governor may, by a subsequent notification under clause (2) of Article 243-Q of the Constitution, include or exclude any area in or from a transitional area or a smaller urban area referred to in sub-section (1), as the case may be.
(3) The notifications referred to in sub-sections (1) and (2) shall be subject to the condition of the notification being issued after the previous publication required by Section 4 and notwithstanding anything in this section, no area which is, or is part of, a cantonment shall be declared to be a transitional area or a smaller urban area or be included therein under this section.
4. Article 243Q of the Constitution which confers power to the Governor to include or exclude any area, as well as power to constitute a Nagar Panchayat, a Municipal Council, or a Municipal Corporation, reads thus :
(1) There shall be constituted in every State,-
(a) a Nagar Panchayat by whatever name called for a transitional area, that is to say, an area in transition from a rural area to an urban area.
(b) a Municipal Council for a smaller urban area; and
(c) a Municipal Corporation for a larger urban area, in accordance with the provisions of this Part:
Provided that a Municipality under this clause may not be constituted in such urban area or part thereof as the Governor may, having regard to the size of tile area and the municipal services being provided or proposed to be provided by an industrial establishment in that area and such other factors as he may deem fit, by public notification, specify to be an industrial township.
(2) In this article, 'a transitional area', 'a smaller urban area' or 'a larger urban area' means such area as the Governor may, having regard to the population of the area, the den
The main legal point established in the judgment is that Notifications issued under Section 5(1)(B) of the Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 must fulfill the requirements of Article 243Q of the....
The failure to consider objections submitted within the statutory timeframe invalidates the notification regarding the inclusion of a Gram Panchayat in a Nagar Panchayat.
The court established that adherence to statutory notification and objection processes is essential for valid municipal governance actions.
The notifications for municipal formation and alteration complied with constitutional mandates and statutory requirements, and the principles of natural justice were not violated.
The provisions of the Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 2006 shall have no application in respect of the areas to which the provisions of the Municipal Act are applied.
Mandate of Section 9 of the Act being that Governor should form an opinion that objections to the proposed notification being insufficient or invalid, would alone qualify for notification being issue....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.