SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 558

SUJOY PAUL, ANIL VERMA
Arun Singh Chouhan – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Petitioner Arun Singh Chouhan in person; Vivek Dalal, A.A.G. for, respondents/State.

ORDER

Paul, J:-- 1. The petitioner, a practising Advocate has filed this Public Interest Litigation wherein it is prayed as under:-

(a) Issue appropriate writ of quo warranto and may direct to respondents to take serious disciplinary action against respondent No.4 and if he is unable to show or prove such an authority he may be ousted and restrained from functioning in the office and future bar also may be directed, which he has unlawfully usurped and intruded into or is unlawfully holding.

(b) Issue appropriate writ and may cost penalty on respondent for being on such post without proper authority for so long (one and half year)

(c) Issue appropriate writ and if he is not able to prove his authority then all the actions and proceedings taken by him must be suspended with immediate effects.

(d) Issue any other further order/orders or direction/directions as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and appropriate to the facts and the circumstances of this case.”

2. In para three of the petition, it is averred as under:-

“That the petitioner is shattered by that an officer of different district is how liable to become an SDO/SDM of different district as the matter of fact is that the r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top