SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 566

SATYENDRA KUMAR SINGH
Swarit Verma – Appellant
Versus
Kanchan Verma – Respondent


Advocates:
Girish Shrivastava for petitioner; Piyush Gupta for respondent.

ORDER

1. This petition under article 227 of Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner-husband against the impugned order dated 29.7.2021, passed by the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Jabalpur in Matrimonial Case No.728/2021, whereby an application jointly filed by the petitioner-husba nd and respondent-wife for urgent hearing in second motion of the application filed under section 13-B r/w section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955, for divorce on mutual consent, in order to the cooling-off period of six months has been rejected.

2. Factual matrix giving rise to this petition is that marriage between the parties took place on 13.12.2006 at Jabalpur. Out of their wedlock, they were blessed with a child namely Tanishq on 26.6.2012. Since 15.9.2019, parties are living separately. Disputes between them gave rise to civil and criminal proceedings. Finally on 28.7.2021 a settlement was arrived at to resolve all the disputes and seek divorce by mutual consent. The respondent-wife is to be given permanent alimony of Rs.5,00,000/-. Custody of child is to be with the petitioner-husband. Accordingly, on 28.7.2021 an application under section 13-B r/w section 25 of Hindu Mar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top