SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(MP) 27

PRANAY VERMA
Rupika Rathor (Smt. ) – Appellant
Versus
Anant Rathor – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Alok Tiwari for petitioner; Ronak Jain for respondent.

ORDER

1. By this petition preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 23.1.2025 passed in RCSHM No.2698/2024 by the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, District Indore whereby a joint application filed by the parties herein to waive the mandatory cooling off period of six months as provided under section 13-B (2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter refereed to as 'the Act') has been rejected.

2. Admittedly the petitioner and the respondent's marriage was solemnized on 25.6.2020 and they are living separately since 6.2.2021, whereas an application under section 13-B of the Act for divorce by mutual consent has been filed on 21.10.2024. Thereafter, a joint application to waive off cooling period of six months was filed on 21.1.2025 wherein it was mentioned that since both the parties have already settled their disputes, the same be allowed and the main application for grant of divorce by mutual consent be considered and allowed. The aforesaid application has been rejected by the Family Court by the impugned order.

3. Learned counsel for the parties have relied upon a decision of the Supreme Court in the case of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top