SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 601

MANU SHRIVASTAVA
Ramswarup – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
S. K. Awasthi and K.D. Dixit for applicant;
M. K. Jain, Government Advocate for non-applicant/State.

vkns'k

1- ;g fuxjkuh e-iz- Hkw&jktLo lafgrk] 1959 ¼ftls vkxs la{ksi esa lafgrk dgk tk,xk½ dh /kkjk 50 ds vUrxZr vij vk;qDr] pacy laHkkx }kjk ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 8-7-2010 ds fo#) izLrqr dh xbZ gSA

2- izdj.k ds rF; la{ksi esa bl izdkj gSa fd n~okfjdk izlkn iq= izgykn eh.kk fuoklh ik.Mksyk ds uk;c rglhynkj cM+kSnk ds le{k vkosnu nsdj crk;k fd xzke ik.Mksyk fLFkr Hkwfe losZ Øekad 1656 jdck 6 ch?kk ¼ftls vkxs iz'uk/khu Hkwfe dgk tk,xk½ ctjaxk iq= Hkaojyky ekyh ds uke 'kkldh; vfHkys[k esa vafdr gSA fdUrq bl Hkwfe dks ctjaxk us 4&5 o"kZ iwoZ #-5000@& ysdj vkosnd dks dCtk ns fn;k x;k] ftlds dkj.k mls HkwfeLokeh LoRo mRiUu gks x, gSa] vr% mlds uke Hkwfe dk bUnzkt fd;k tk,A uk;c rglhynkj us izdj.k Øekad 10@1998&99@v&46 iathc) dj lquokbZ mijkar vkns'k fnukad 30-9-1999 ds }kjk gfjdk izlkn eh.kk dks ewy ekfyd dh lgefr ds vk/kkj ij ekS#lh Ñ"kd vkSj fQj HkwfeLokeh vf/kdkj lafgrk dh /kkjk 168 ds rgr fn, x,A

vij dysDVj ';ksiqj }kjk uk;c rglhynkj ds izdj.k dk ijh{k.k djus ij vkns'k fnukad 30-9-1999 esa vfu;ferrk ik, tkus ij] izdj.k Loeso fuxjkuh esa ysdj iathc) fd;k x;k rFkk fgrc) i{kdkjksa dh lquokbZ mijkar vkns'k fnukad 30-3-2010 esa ;g fu"d"kZ fudkyk x;k fd vkosnd i{k ekS#lh Ñ"kd izekf.kr djus ds f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top