SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 631

SHEEL NAGU, PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
Nirmala Devi (Smt. ) – Appellant
Versus
Anil Kumar Tiwari – Respondent


Advocates:
Kamal Singh Baghel for appellant; Dileep Kumar Pandey for respondent.
.

JUDGMENT

1. This is a wife’s appeal under section 19 of the Family Courts Act 1984, against the judgment and decree dated 13th April 2018, passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Rewa in Civil Suit No.48-A/2015, by which the petition of the respondent-husband under section 11 of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955 [hereinafter in short “the Act of 1955”] has been allowed and the marriage solemnized between the parties has been declared as null and void.

2. Some of the admitted facts for the decision of the present appeal are as under :-

(i) On 18.5.2014, the marriage between the parties was solemnized at village Khandora, Tahsil Deosar, District Singrauli (M.P) according to Hindu rites and rituals.

(ii) The appellant-wife had already been married in the year 1984 as per Hindu rites and rituals with one Amarjeet Pandey, when she was only aged about 8-10 years.

(iii) The marriage of appellant-wife with her earlier husband Amarjeet Pandey, was dissolved on 15.7.2015 (Ex-D-7) vide judgment and decree under section 13(B) of the Act of 1955, passed by Additional District Judge Deosar, District Singrauli.

(iv) On 14.5.2015, the respondent-husband preferred a petition under section 11 of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top