SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 633

S. A. DHARMADHIKARI
Shiv Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Priyank Agrawal for applicants; Akshay Pawar, Panel Lawyer for respondent/State.

ORDER

1. In this petition filed under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the legality, validity and propriety of the order dated 28.9.2021 (Annexure P/4) has been questioned, whereby the application filed by the Additional Public Prosecutor in Sessions Case No.176/2012 under section 63 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (hereinafter referred to as “Act”) has been allowed by the learned Court below and permitted to produce the photocopy of cheques and photocopy of a complaint as secondary evidence.

2. The prosecution case, in brief, as reflected from the charge sheet and the impugned order is that an FIR dated 26.3.2012 was registered on the basis of a complaint made by one Munni and Anarkali against the applicants and another coaccused for offences punishable under sections 420, 409, 468, 471 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. On completion of investigation, charge sheet was filed against the applicants and another co-accused. One of the co-accused persons died in an accident. Thereafter, charges were framed against the applicants which were denied by them and as such, they were put on trial. During the course of the trial, an application was moved by the Additional Pub

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top