SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 643

VIVEK RUSIA
Bhagirath – Appellant
Versus
Firoz – Respondent


Advocates:
Rakesh Pal for applicant; Neeraj Saraf for respondent.

ORDER

1. Present revision has been filed against judgment dated 14.8.2019 passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kukshi, Distt. Dhar, whereby applicant has been convicted under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and sentenced him to under 06 months rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.1,62,350/-. Against the aforesaid order, he preferred a Criminal Appeal No.37/2019 before the II Additional Sessions Judge, Kukshi, District Dhar and vide judgment dated 13.11.2021 appellate Court has dismissed the appeal confirming the aforesaid conviction, sentence and fine. Hence, the present revision before this Court.

2. Present revision is filed along with a compromise deed and according to which entire amount of Rs.1,62,350/- has been paid by Criminal Revision No.3198/2021 way of cheque. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that cheque has been encahsed and the complainant has received the amount. He has no objection if the jail sentence is reduced to the period already undergone, as there is no minimum sentence provided under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

3. Since the parties are entering into compromise at the stage of revision, therefore, law laid down by the apex

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top