SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 65

ANJULI PALO
Gyanchand Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Pramod Kumar Gupta – Respondent


Advocates:
Vikas Mishra for applicant, Durgesh Pandey for respondent.

ORDER

1. This criminal revision under section 397/401 of Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant against the judgment of conviction dated 23.11.2021 passed by 9th Additional Sessions Judge, Satna in Criminal Appeal No.36/2020 whereby the applicant has been convicted for an offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to undergo R.I. for 6 months and he has been directed to pay compensation under section 357(3) Cr.P.C. of Rs.3,88,108/- as also to pay cost of Rs.28,000/-.

2. Facts of the case, in brief, the applicant being in need of money for his domestic necessities approached the respondent for providing financial assistance to the tune of Rs.2,50,000/-. In lieu of financial assistance, he offered the respondent that he would be mortgaging his house for 5 months by executing the mortgage deed dt. 10.7.2013 and giving the cheque worth Rs.2,50,000/- of Dena Bank, Branch Satna. It was agreed that if the applicant would not be able to repay the amount of Rs.2,50,000/-, then complainant was free to lodge the cheque with its Banker. Till 31.12.2013 the applicant could not repay the amount, and accordingly, complainant asked the applicant for repayment of chequ

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top