SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 654

SUJOY PAUL, PRANAY VERMA
Awatar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Rahul Vijaywargiya for petitioner; Vivek Dalal, Additional Advocate General for respondents/State.

ORDER

With the consent of the parties, heard finally.

1. This petition is directed against the order of learned District Magistrate, Dewas whereby he has detained the petitioner by exercising power under section 3 of the Prevention of Black Marketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities Act, 1980. The singular ground to assail the impugned order is that in the detention order, the learned District Magistrate has not mentioned that petitioner has a valuable right to prefer a representation against the detention order before the same authority namely District Magistrate. The matter is covered by Full Bench decision in WP No.22290/2019 (Kamal Khare v. State of MP) 2021(2) MPLJ 554. [Reported in 2021 (2) JLJ 389 (FB)]

2. Shri Vivek Dalal, learned Additional Advocate General for the respondents/State fairly admitted that the detention order does not contain any such stipulation that petitioner can prefer representation against the detention order before the same authority. He further agreed that on this ground, Full Bench in Kamal Khare (supra) has held that the detention order stands vitiated because of infringement of said right.

3. There is no dispute between the parties

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top