SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 17

RAJEEV KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA
Balli Chaudhary alias Rakesh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Prashant Sharma for applicant; Purushottam Tanwar for respondent/State.

ORDER

1. The present criminal revision under section 397 r/w section 401 of CrPC has been preferred assailing the order dated 2.3.2021 passed by Second Additional Sessions Judge, Dabra, District Gwalior (MP) in Sessions Trial No.16 of 2021,whereby charges under sections 307, 34 and 452 of IPC have been framed against the applicant.

2. In brief, facts of the case are that complainant Parmal Singh Bundela recorded a Dehati Nalishi at Police Station Bhitarwar, stating therein that he is staying in village Kahriya and running a grocery shop. Accused Rinku Chaudhary Rinku molested his daughter, therefore, on the date of incident i.e. 7.9.2020, he along with her daughter, had gone to the medical dispensary, (CHC), Bhitarwar and the police personnel had also come there. When he was in injection room, applicant- accused along with other co-accused persons who were armed with sword & hockey stick, entered in the room of medical dispensary and accused Balli Chaudhary alias Rakesh inflicted injury on his head by means of hockey stick as a result of blood started oozing. On that basis, FIR bearing Crime No.409/2020 has been lodged for offence under sections 307, 323, 34 of IPC at Police Station

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top