SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 74

PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
State Bank of India – Appellant
Versus
Tarun Kumar Pradhan – Respondent


Advocates:
Ashish Shroti for petitioner;
Praveen Yadav for respondent No. 1.

ORDER

1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against the award dated 15.10.2012 (Annexure P/15) and award dated 16.7.2014 (Annexure P/16) passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal (for short “CGIT”) in case No. CGIT/LC- 241/1997, whereby, the order dated 6.9.1995 imposing punishment of termination of the respondent-workman, has been set aside and the respondent- workman has been directed to be reinstated with continuity of service and 40% back wages.

2. The facts of the case are that respondent/workman was appointed in the petitioner-Bank on 1.9.1975 on the post of Clerk-cum-Cashier. He was confirmed in service w.e.f 1.3.1976. On account of some financial irregularities relating to withdrawal of certain amount, a charge sheet dated 11.3.1993 (Annexure P-1) was served on the respondent- workman, wherein, as many as 06 charges were leveled against him. The charges are mainly related to fraudulent withdrawal of certain amount with an object to take wrongful pecuniary advantage, causing loss to the Bank, utilizing official position and violating the rules- procedure applicable to the employees of the petitioner-Bank. The respondent-workma

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top