SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 122

VIVEK RUSIA, AMAR NATH (KESHARWANI)
Kadliya – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Avinash Sirpurkar and Yogesh Gupta for appellant; Kamal Kumar Tiwari for respondent/State.

JUDGMENT

Looking to the long pendency of this criminal appeal instead of hearing the application for suspension of sentence, with the consent of the parties same is heard finally.

*****

1. Appellant has preferred this appeal under section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short “Cr.P.C.”) against the judgment of conviction dated 30.12.2011, passed by Additional Sessions Judge to the Court of Second Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court) Jobat in Sessions Trial No.114/2011, whereby he has been convicted 302 and 323 of I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment and six months R.I. with fine of Rs.500 for the offence punishable under section 302 of I.P.C. with default stipulation.

2. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is as follows: -

(a) As per the prosecution story on 24.4.2011 at about 19:30, the complainant Walsingh (PW-1) gave information to the Police Station Chandpur that he along with his wife Dhanibai (hereinafter referred to as '' Deceased'') and son Ramsingh were in the home. The deceased was grinding spices, at that time appellant came there, who is the son of his wife from her first husband and told to her that what are you doing and you cooks th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top