PRANAY VERMA
Akhilesh Anjana – Appellant
Versus
Kavita Anjana – Respondent
ORDER
1. By this revision preferred under section 115 of CPC the petitioners/non-applicants have challenged the order dated 30.10.2021 passed in MJC No.5/2021 by Iind Additional District Judge, Mahidpur, District-Ujjain whereby their application under Order 7 rule 11 of CPC for rejection of the petition filed by the respondent/applicant under section 7/25 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 (which shall be referred herein after as “the Act, 1890”) has been rejected.
2. The respondent/applicant has filed an application under section 7/25 of the Act, 1956 before the Court below against the petitioners/non-applicants seeking custody of her minor child i.e. non-applicant No.2 namely Aditya Anjana. She has submitted that she and non-applicant No.1 were married on 30.1.2013. Out of their wedlock non-applicant No.2 was born who is presently aged 3 years and is living with non-applicant No.1. On disputes arising between them, on 2.3.2020 non-applicant No.1 asked the applicant to leave the matrimonial home and custody of non-applicant No.2 was refused to be handed over to her. Since the applicant refused to leave, non-applicant No.1 took her in a four wheeler and left her at her parents plac
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.