SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 138

ANJULI PALO
Ramasre Vishwakarma – Appellant
Versus
Aatmaram Diwakar – Respondent


Advocates:
Arpan Shrivastava for applicant; Kapil Patwardhan, for respondent.

ORDER

1. In this criminal revision under section 397 read with section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procecure the applicant/accused has challenged the judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Bhopal in Criminal Appeal No.726/2018 on 30.7.2021 whereby he has affirmed the judgment of conviction passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bhopal against the appilcant for offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and order of sentence to undergo R.I. for 6 months and to pay compensation of Rs.1,90,500/- under section 357(3) of Cr.P.C.

2. The facts in brief are that applicant/accused and respondent/complainant are familiar with each other. In April, 2015 the wife of applicant, namely, Smt.Radhika Vishwakarma requested respondent to grant loan of Rs.3,51,400/- to meet out her personal expenses. On the basis of familarity the complainant gave the aforesaid amount to wife of applicant/accused as loan. When the complainant made demand for repayment of loan amount, the applicant/accused gave cheque bearing No.363407 dated 6.11.2015 of Central Bank of India amounting to Rs.1,50,000/- with an assurance that if complainant lodg

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top