SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 99

PRANAY VERMA
Madan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
R.R. Bhatnagar for applicant; Mukesh Mukawat, Government Advocate for respondent/State.

ORDER

1. This is the first application under section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, as the applicant is implicated in connection with Crime No.33/2022 registered at Police Station – Alot, District – Ratlam (M.P.) for offence punishable under section 450, 195-A, 376, 323, 506-II, 294 of IPC.

2. The applicant is in custody since 21.1.2022.

3. As per prosecution, on 20.1.2022 at about 07:00 PM the applicant forcibly entered into the house of prosecutrix on account of enmity between them regarding some old case, threatened her and committed rape upon her. Thereafter on the next day again he threatened her and abused her. On lodging of FIR by the prosecutrix, the present applicant has been implicated and has been arrested for the present offence.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that prosecutrix has been examined before the trial Court and she has not supported the case of prosecution in any manner and has been declared hostile. She has specifically stated that applicant has not committed any rape upon her and no incident as alleged has ever taken place. Thus, in view of the statement of prosecutrix herself, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail particularly

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top