SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 1164

PRANAY VERMA
Hemant – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Vinod Thakur, Advocate, Hitendra Tripathi, Advocate
Final Result : Allowed

JUDGMENT

Pranay Verma, J. - This is second application under Section 439 of CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE , 1973. The applicant is implicated in connection with Crime No.99/2022 registered at Police Station Gogawa, District Khagone (MP) for offence punishable under Sections 376 , 506. 34 of the IPC.

2. The applicant is in custody since 16.02.2022.

3 . First application bearing M.Cr.C. No.27563/2022 was dismissed as withdrawn by order dated 04.07.2022.

4 . As per the prosecution, the prosecutrix was a resident of Gram Nandgaon Bagudh. Her uncle had met with an accident hence she had gone to see him. In Gogawa she had asked one boy the way to Bilkhed, who had asked her come with him. There was one friend of his also alongwith him. The boy took the prosecutrix near a river and threatened her and committed rape upon her. He also threatened her with life thereafter and told her not to narrate the incident to anyone and both of them thereafter left. On lodging of the report by the prosecutrix, the applicant has been implicated and arrested for the present offence.

5. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the case. The prosecutrix

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top