SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 176

SUBODH ABHYANKAR
Sachin Jain – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Vinay Saraf with Rizwan Khan for applicant;
Akash Sharma, Government Advocate for respondent/State.

ORDER

1. They are heard. Perused the case-diary.

2. This petition has been filed under section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing the First Information Report (FIR) registered at Crime No.47 of 2020, under sections 376, 294 and 506 of IPC at Police Station Mahila Thana, Palasia, Indore on 21.07.2020, as also the subsequent charge-sheet filed in the case, which is pending before the VIII Additional Sessions Judge, Indore as S.T. No.95 of 2021.

3. In brief, the facts giving rise to the present petition are that on 21.7.2020, an FIR has been lodged by the prosecutrix against the present petitioner under sections 376, 294 and 506 of IPC, stating that she is a resident of Indore and is a divorcee having a four years' old son, residing with her mother, brother and sister-in-law. Further, her case is that she wanted to settle in life once again, and with this purpose to remarry, she uploaded her bio data on a matrimonial site for marriage and subsequently the present petitioner Sachin Jain showed his interest in her, and spoke to her on telephone and after satisfying that she is a divorcee started talking to her from 30.8.2019. Thereafter, the petitioner left for China and came back in the month

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top