IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
S.A. Dharmadhikari, J.
Ramraj Patel v. State Election Commission & others
Writ Petition No. 15991 of 2022 (Jabalpur); Decided on 13.7.2022
iapk;r fuokZpu fu;e] 1995 ¼eŒçŒ½ & fuŒ 77¼2½ rFkk 80¼1½ & o¨V¨a dh iquxZ.kuk & ihBklhu vfèkdkjh }kjk o¨V¨a dh iquxZ.kuk d¢ fy, vkosnu ij fopkj ugha fd;k x;k & dysDVj d¢ le{k vH;kosnu fd;k x;k & dysDVj us vkosnu dk fofu'p; djus d¢ fy, fuokZpu vfèkdkjh d¨ funsf'kr fd;k & fuokZpu vfèkdkjh }kjk d¨Ã dkjZokbZ ugha dh xà & mPp U;k;ky; us ml vkosnu dk fofu'p; djus d¢ fy, fuokZpu vfèkdkjh d¨ funsf'kr fd;kA ¼iSjk 6½
Panchayat Nirvachan Niyam, 1995 (M.P.) -- Rr. 77(2) and 80(1) -- recounting of votes -- application for recounting of votes not considered by Presiding Officer -- representation made before Collector -- Collector directed Returning Officer to take decision on application -- no action taken by Returning Officer -- High Court directed Returning Officer to take decision on such application. [Para 6]
ORDER
1. In this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is seeking a direction to the respondents authorities for recounting of votes of polling booths No.25 and 26 in respect of election held on 25.6.2022 for the post of Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Chhatragarh Kala, Janpad Panchayat, Naigarhi, District Rewa.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the polling took place on 25.6.2022. The petitioner submitted representation before the respondent No.3 for recounting of votes in accordance with Rule 77(2) r/w Rule 80(1) of the Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Nirvachan Niyam, 1995, (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules of 1995') on 25.6.2022 but the same was not considered. Having no other option left, he approached the Collector on 27.6.2022 vide Annexure P-4 and the representation was duly received by the office of Collector, which contains the seal of the Collector. Acting upon the representation filed by the petitioner, the Collector Rewa vide order dated 27.6.2022 (Annexure P-5) directed the Returning Officer to take a decision on the application of petitioner.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submitted that in identical petition bearing W.P.No.15343/2022 and W.P.No.14894/2022 seeking similar relief, this Court has allowed the petition directing the respondents to recount the votes before declaration of results.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that in spite of directions given by the Collector, no action has been taken on the application, therefore, in the light of aforesaid, the Returning Officer may be directed to take decision on the application of petitioner and in view of the directions issued on 27.6.2022.
5. Learned counsel Shri Seth fairly stated that the decision is likely to be taken by the Returning Officer and in case no decision has been taken, the same be taken immediately in view of order dated 27.06.2022 (Annexure P-5).
6. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the Returning Officer is directed to take a decision on the application dated 27.6.2022 (Annexure P-4) forthwith in the light of order dated 27.6.2022, annexure P/5, on submission of the certified copy of the order passed today by the petitioner before the Returning Officer and take a decision thereon and communicate the same to the petitioner.
7. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.
With the aforesaid directions, this petition stands disposed of.
The Court emphasized the limitation of objections to the vote counting process, affirming that failure to raise timely objections precludes recount requests.
The election for Sarpanch was declared void due to procedural violations and manipulation in vote counting, emphasizing the necessity of following established electoral processes.
An election petitioner must provide clear and substantial evidence of material irregularities to warrant a recount; mere procedural errors or small margin discrepancies are insufficient.
Recounting of votes cannot be ordered solely based on a thin margin of difference between the winning and runner-up candidates. The Election Tribunal must analyze the evidence and find grounds for re....
Election petitions must demonstrate a prima facie case of irregularities for recounting of votes; non-framing of issues does not invalidate proceedings if parties understand the disputes.
The necessity for a prima facie case to be established before ordering a recount of votes, and the requirement for adequate statement of material facts and contemporaneous evidence to support the all....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.