SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 269

RAVI MALIMATH, ANAND PATHAK
Richa – Appellant
Versus
Pradhuman Dubey – Respondent


Advocates:
N. K. Gupta for appellant; S. K. Shrivastava for respondent.

JUDGMENT

Pathak, J. -- 1. Present appeal under section 19 of Family Court Act 1984 read with section 28 of Hindu Marriage Act 1955 (hereinafter referred as “Act 1955”) is preferred at the instance of defendant / wife being aggrieved by the judgment dated 6.9.2017 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Guna whereby application of husband under section 13 of Act 1955 is allowed. The said application is allowed on the point of mental cruelty and therefore, marriage is ordered to be dissolved accordingly.

2. Precisely stated facts of the case are that on 1.5.2014, appellant / wife and respondent / husband got married according to Hindu rites and rituals at Guna. After marriage, appellant wanted to continue her education and to appear in competitive examinations, she joined coaching classes. Respondent is a teacher in Government School and as per allegations, after leaving for his school, appellant’s wife used to move around outside their house and whenever interrupted, she raised ruckus and commotion. On 3.12.2014, she fell ill, therefore, taken to District Hospital Guna where she admitted till 7.12.2014. When she did not recover then she was taken to a private hospital where respond

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top