SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 315

S. A. DHARMADHIKARI
Akanksha Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Rajkamal Chaturvedi for petitioner; Dheeraj Kumar Tiwari, Panel Lawyer, for respondents.

ORDER

1. Heard finally with the consent of both the parties.

2. In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has assailed the validity, legality and propriety of the order dated 5.7.2017 (Annexure P/3) passed by the respondent No.1; whereby the application filed by the petitioner for grant of arms licence under section 14 (1) (b) (ii) of the Arms Act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) has been rejected without passing any speaking order.

3. For the purpose of convenience, the impugned order dated 5.7.2017 (Annexure P/3) is reproduced below:

e/; çns'k 'kklu

x`g foHkkx

ea=ky;] oYyHk Hkou] Hkksiky

vkns'k

Hkksiky] fnukad 5-7-2017

Øekad ,QŒ 16&212@2016@ch&1@nks&Jherh vkdka{kk flag iRuh Jh dqynhi] fuoklh dysDVj caxyk ds ihNs] ftyk Nrjiqj dks ,d voftZr cksj fiLVy@fjokYoj 'kL= yk;lsal lgefr ckor ÁLrko dk ijh{k.k fd;k x;kA vkosnd dks fdlh O;fDr@lewg fo'ks"k ls [krjk ugha gksus ls 'kklu dh uohu 'kL= uhfr ds varxZr ik=rk ugha vkrh gSA vr,o vk;q/k vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 14¼1½] [k¼2½ ds rgr ÁLrko vkSfpR;iw.kZ ,oa lek/kkudkjd u ik;s tkus ds QyLo:i iw.kZ fopkjksijkar vekU; fd;k tkrk gSA

2- Hkkjr ljdkj ds jkti= ljy Øekad 373] fnukad 24-07-2012 esa Ádkf'kr x`g ea=ky; d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top