SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 352

SANJAY DWIVEDI
Rooplal – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Amit Khatri for petitioner; Swapnil Ganguly, Dy. Advocate General for respondents.

ORDER

1. Pleadings are complete. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is finally heard.

2. This petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India asking following relief:-

(i) To issue a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the notification issued u/s 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act 1894 (L.A.Act) dated 14.6.1978 whereby the land of the petitioner was said to be acquired and further notification u/s 6 was issued on 22.7.1978 (Annexure P-3);

(ii) Call for the records and proceedings of Appeal Case No.0044/Appeal/2021-22 from the file of learned respondent No.2, Case No.057/Appeal/2021-2022 from the file of learned respondent No.5 and Case No.518/B121/2020-21 from the file of learned Court of respondent No.6 for their perusal;

(iii) To issue a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 25.11.2021 (Annexure-P/15) passed by the Court of Additional Collector, DistrictChhindwara in Revenue Case No.0044/Appeal/2021-22 and order dated 16.8.2021 (Annexure P-13) passed by the Court of respondent No.5 in Case No.057/Appeal/2021-2022 and order dated 12.7.2021 (Annexure P-11) passed by the Court of respondent No.6 in Case

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top