DINESH KUMAR PALIWAL
Devendra Kumar Tiwri – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER
1. This petition under section 482 of Cr.P.C. has been filed assailing the order dated 11.1.2023 passed by Special Judge POCSO Act, Sirmour, District Rewa whereby upon filing of charge sheet for commission of offence under sections 354 & 354 (A) of IPC and section 9/10 of POCSO Act, 2012, Special Judge/Additional Sessions Judge has directed for issuance of arrest warrant for securing the appearance of applicant who was not arrested during trial. Notice under section 41(A) of Cr.P.C. was issued directing him to remain present in the Sirmour Court on 16.12.2021 at the time of filing of charge sheet but he did not turn up.
2. Learned senior counsel has contended that learned trial Court instead of issuing summons at the very first instance of filing charge sheet has directed to issue arrest warrant for securing the prsence of the applicant in the case..
3 . By placing reliance on the judgment of Aman Preet Singh v. CBI through Director, 2021 SCC Online SC 941, Siddharth v. State of UP and another, (2022) 1 SCC 676 and Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2021) 10 SCC 773 learned senior counsel has contended that Supreme Court in aforesaid cases an
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.