SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 385

DWARKA DHISH BANSAL
State of M. P. – Appellant
Versus
Premkumar Wadhwani – Respondent


Advocates:
Mukund Agrawal, Government. Advocate for appellants.

JUDGMENT

1. This first appeal has been preferred by the appellants/defendants 1-2/State Government challenging the judgment and decree dated 7.4.1997 passed by 1st Additional District Judge, Bhopal in Civil Suit No.10-A/1996, whereby suit filed by the respondents 1-4/plaintiffs has been decreed holding the notice dated 2.4.1996 to be illegal and that the defendants have no right to make any interference in the construction activities being carried out by the plaintiffs. Accordingly, permanent injunction has also been granted against the defendants.

2. In short the facts are that the plaintiffs claimed themselves to be owner and in possession of the disputed land total area 15700 sq.ft. bearing in khasra No.26, opposite Neelkanth Colony, ward No.9, Idgah Hills, Bhopal allegedly purchased by them from one Gulshan-E-Gandhi Housing Co-operative Society, Bhopal through four registered sale deeds. It is alleged in the plaint that Nazul Officer, Bhopal also granted no objection certificate in respect of the aforesaid land and before granting NOC, the Nazul Officer made all the legal enquiry as to whether the land belonged to the Government or not and ultimately the Nazul Officer, Bhopal i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top