SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 363

PRANAY VERMA
Bhanwarlal – Appellant
Versus
Toofan Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Akash Sharma for petitioners; Jyoti Swaroop Dave for respondents.

ORDER

1. By this petition preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioners have challenged the order dated 28.8.2019 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Ujjain Division, Ujjain whereby the order dated 29.8.2017 passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, Tehsil and District Shajapur dismissing their appeal as barred by time and the order dated 29.8.2017 passed by the Additional Tehsildar, Tappa Maksi, Tehsil and District Shajapur have been set aside.

2. The facts in brief are that the petitioners made an application under section 178 of M.P. Land Revenue Code, 1959 (here-in-after referred to as "the Code, 1959") for partition of the lands in dispute before the Additional Tahsildar, Maksi, District Ujjain. The application was allowed by the Additional Tahsildar and the partition as prayed for was permitted and order in that regard was passed in Namantaran Panji No.5 on 15.6.2005.

3. Being aggrieved by the order aforesaid the respondents preferred an appeal under section 44 (1) of the Code, 1959 before the Sub Divisional Officer, Shajapur. Since the same was barred by time by about 11 years they filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top