SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 56

VIVEK RUSIA
Deepak Malviya – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Pushpendra Kumar Dixit for applicant; Smt. Mamta Shandilya, Government Advocate, for respondent/State.

ORDER

1. The applicant has filed the present revision under section 397 r/w section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashment of the order dated 13.11.2021, whereby the Additional Sessions Judge, Barwani framed charges under Sections 420 r/w section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, section 6 of Madhya Pradesh Nikshepakon Ke Hiton Ka Sanrakshan Adhiniyam & section 3/4 of the Prize Chits & Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978.

2. The investigation has revealed that one resident Ashok Ahirwar lodged an F.I.R. against Santosh More, Santosh Devsat, Rohit Devsat, Munni Devsat, Sanjay Nayak and Lalita Nayak alleging that they explained to him various investment schemes run by Guru Sai Real Estate & Allied Company and took him to its office at Barwani. On their persuasion, he deposited Rs.1,50,000/- on 30.06.2012 and a certificate like FDR bearing registration No.5110005699 disclosing the maturity amount and period was issued by them. After 2 – 3 years, when he went to the local office of the company to get the matured amount from the said policy, the office was found closed. The policy had matured on 31.10.2017, but no amount has been returned to him, hence the accu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top