SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 90

GURPAL SINGH AHLUWALIA
Sunil S/o Ramkishan Jaiswal – Appellant
Versus
Omprakash S/o Ramkishan Jaiswal – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Devendra Kumar Tripathi.

ORDER :

1. This Miscellaneous Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed against the orders dated 20.09.2022 and 21.12.2022 passed by 1st Civil Judge, Senior Division, District Betul (M.P.) in RCA No. 13/2015 by which the applications filed by the petitioner under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC and Order 26 Rule 9 CPC have been rejected.

2. The petitioner has paid two sets of Court fee.

3. It is the case of the petitioner that the respondent No. 1 has filed a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction. Undisputedly, the property in dispute was an ancestral property, which was partitioned amongst five sons of Late Ramkishan. It is the case of the plaintiff that the plot in question fell to his share, whereas it is the case of the defendant No. 1/petitioner that the said plot fell to his share. Since other brothers have alienated or constructed Suyog Colony on their land, therefore, they are necessary party because they would be in a better position to disclose the factual aspect of the matter. Another application under Order 26 Rule 9 CPC was filed for appointment of a local Commissioner to found out the total area of Suyog Colony as well as to find out tha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top