SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 124

SUJOY PAUL, AMAR NATH KESHARWANI
Madhav Paw – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Khalid Noor Fakhruddin for appellants;
S. K. Kashyap, Government Advocate for respondent/State.

JUDGMENT

1. This criminal appeal filed under section 374(2) of Criminal Procedure Code mounts challenge to the judgment dated 24.7.2012 passed in Sessions Case No. 235/2009 decided by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Anuppur whereby four accused persons were held guilty for committing offence under section 148 of I.P.C. and section 302 of IPC read with sections 149 of IPC (two counts) and directed to undergo sentence as under :--

  Convicted under sections

Sentenced to undergo

  148 of the IPC

  302 read with 149 of IPC

  (on two counts) for murdering

  Toran Paw and Munna Paw.

R.I. for 3 years

Life imprisonment and fine of Rs.100/-

R.I. for 6 months (on each count).

With the direction that all the sentences shall run concurrently

2. At the outset, it is relevant to mention here that during the pendency of this appeal vide order dated 12.5.2015 and order dated 13.3.2023, the name of appellant No. 1- Madhav Paw and appellant No. 2- Mandal Paw were directed to be deleted. Thus, this appeal survives only for appellants No. 3 and 4.

3. Admittedly, th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top