IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Ravi Malimath, CJ, and Vishal Mishra, J.
Arti Kushwaha (Smt.) v. Rajesh Kumar Jadia & Another
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 6654 of 2023 (Jabalpur); Decided on 3.4.2023
Criminal P. C., 1973 -- S. 439 -- Penal Code, 1860 -- Ss. 193, 195, 340 and 376 (2) -- bail -- applicant lodged complaint u/s. 376 (2) of IPC -- turned hostile -- proceedings initiated u/s. 340 of CrPC -- warrant of arrest issued -- held -- proceedings already initiated u/ss. 193 and 195 of IPC -- she has to face trial -- no reason why she has been taken into custody for said purpose -- she can always be summoned for investigation as and when required by prosecution -- bail allowed. [Para 5
naM izfØ;k lafgrk] 1973 &&/kkjk 439 && naM lafgrk] 1860 &&/kkjk 193] 195] 340 rFkk 376 ¼2½ && tekur && vkosfndk us naM lafgrk dh /kkjk 376 ¼2½ ds v/khu f'kdk;r dh && i{knzksgh gks xbZ && naM izfØ;k lafgrk dh /kkjk 340 ds v/khu dk;Zokgh vkjaHk dh xbZ && fxjrkjh okWjaV tkjh && vfHkfu/kkZfjr && naM lafgrk dh/kkjk 193 rFkk 195 ds v/khu dk;Zokgh vkjaHk gks pqdh && mls fopkj.k dk lkeuk djuk gS && mDr iz;kstu ds fy, mls vfHkj{kk esa fy, tkus dk dksbZ dkj.k ugha && tc Hkh vUos"k.k ds fy, vko';d gks] mls vfHk;kstui{k }kjk cqyk;k tk ldrk gS && tekur eatwjA ¼iSjk 5
ORDER
1. This is the first application filed under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking for bail on behalf of the applicant relating to R.C.T No.616 of 2022 in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Panna for the offence under sections 193 and 195 of the IPC.
2. The case of the applicant is that she lodged a complaint against the accused for offence punishable under section 376 (2) of the IPC. The same was registered at Police Station - Ajaygarh District Panna in Crime No.29 of 2022. The investigation was taken up. The charge-sheet was filed. During the course of trial, the complainant did not support the prosecution version. She was treated to be hostile. As a consequence whereof, while acquitting the accused, the trial Court directed initiation of proceedings under section 340 of the Cr.P.C. against the applicant herein on the application being filed by the Assistant Prosecution Officer. Thereafter by the order dated 25.5.2022, a warrant of arrest has been issued against the applicant. She was arrested on 20.1.2023. The application for bail before the Sessions Court was rejected on 24.1.2023 in B.A.No.25 of 2023. Therefore, the instant application is filed.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant contends that the applicant is not required by the respondent for prosecution and she is unnecessarily being harassed by the respondent.
4. The same is disputed by the Government Advocate. He submits that a prima facie case exists which does not entail the applicant to be released on bail.
5. On hearing learned counsels, we are of the view that appropriate interference is called for. The question of issuance of warrant of arrest against the applicant, in our considered view, may not be appropriate. The proceedings have already been initiated against the applicant for offence punishable under sections 193 and 195 of the IPC. Therefore, she has to face the trial. We do not find any reason as to why she has been taken into custody for the said purpose. She can always be summoned for purposes of investigation as and when required by the prosecution.
6. Hence, for all these reasons, the application is allowed and applicant Smt. Arti Kushwaha is directed to be enlarged on bail on she furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court for her regular appearance during the trial in the aforesaid case.
7. The applicant shall also comply with the conditions enumerated under section 437 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure meticulously.
8. The bail application stands disposed off accordingly.
SupremeToday
The court has the discretion to grant bail based on the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.
The court has the discretion to grant bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. based on the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.
The court established that bail under Section 438 CrPC can be granted based on the evolving circumstances of the case and the nature of the allegations, emphasizing the importance of the complainant'....
Requirement of formal arrest before applying for bail under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.
The court's decision to grant bail was influenced by the nature of the offence, the stage of the trial, and the likelihood of the applicant absconding or tampering with the prosecution case.
The court has the discretion to grant bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. based on the totality of the facts and circumstances, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.
An accused is entitled to be released on bail if he has been in detention for a considerable period, the charge sheet has been filed, and the trial would take considerable time to conclude.
The court may grant bail based on the length of custody and the time the trial would take, without commenting on the merits of the case.
Granting bail based on the improbable nature of the allegations, the medical report, and the applicant's undertaking to cooperate in the trial and investigation.
Grant of bail based on similarity of the case with a previously granted bail to a co-accused and without commenting on the merits of the case.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.