SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 970

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Nathi Bai – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Swaroop Singh Sisodia, Advocate, Laxman Solanki, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.82/2021, Police Station Kelwada, District Rajsamand, for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 201, 148, 115, 109 of IPC.

2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that similarly situated co-accused Prem Singh has already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court and the case of the present petitioner is similar to that of co-accused. Counsel further submits that petitioner is a lady. The accused-petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application.

4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

5. accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Smt. Nathi Bai W/o Shri Heera S

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top