SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 155

RAVI MALIMATH, VISHAL MISHRA
Aarti Dayma – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Anshul Tiwari for petitioner; Bharat Singh, Additional
Advocate General for respondent No. 1/State.

ORDER

1. This petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs :

" (i) To call for the relevant records of the case from respondents.

(ii) To quash the impugned order dated 10.10.2020 (Annexure P-6) issued by respondent No. 3 by a writ of Certiorari for any other appropriate writ direction or order.

(iii) To command the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners for continue on the post of guest faculty in Home Science on the basis of his positive merits.

(iv) Allowed this petition with costs.

(v) Pass such other orders as may be deemed appropriate in the facts and circumstances of the case to grant relief to the petitioner. "

2. It is the case of the petitioner that she was working in the respondent's department as Guest Faculty having a long experience. It is submitted that she was working since last more than 8 years as Guest Faculty with utmost honesty and sincerity. It is further submitted that she is working in the respondent college since 2016-17 and her appointment is through the selection process, which is legal and valid. She was continuously teaching but the respondents No.1 and 2 advertised the post of petitioner. Therefore, aggrieved by the action

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top