SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 103

RAVI MALIMATH, VISHAL MISHRA
Dinesh Kumar Malviy – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Himanshu Shrivastava for petitioner; Suyash Thakur, Government Advocate for respondents/State

ORDER

1. The present petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs :

"(i) That, by issuance of writ in Mandamus, Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the respondent to regularize the petitioner on the post of Primary, Middle and Uchha Madhyamik Sikshak.

(ii) That, by issuance of writ in Mandamus, Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the respondent to decide the representation filed by the petitioners for their regularization.

(iii) Any other writ/direction/order which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper including cost of this petition may kindly be granted."

2. It is the case of the petitioner that he has been engaged with the respondents as Guest Faculty (Atithi Shikshak Grade-I, Grade-II & Grade-III) for the last 10 to 15 years. He has passed the Teacher Eligibility Test and is also having B.Ed. and D.Ed. qualification. The petitioner has been continuing on the post of Guest Faculty till date. He has made several representations for regularization on the post of Guest Faculty Grade-I or Grade-II or Grade-III, but to no avail. Hence, the present petition has been filed seeking regularization on the post.

3. A perusal of the record indicates that the petitioner has

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top