IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Anand Pathak, J.
Mahasingh Parte v. State of M.P.
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 14647 of 2023 (J); Decided on 13.4.2023
Criminal P.C. 1973 -- S. 439 -- bail -- sixty litres of country made liquor seized from possession of applicant -- arrested -- suffering confinement for last 1 month -- charge-sheet already filed -- chance should be given for course correction -- applicant to plant and care for two fruit or shade trees as per spirit of community service -- bail granted. 2020 (3) MPLJ (Cri.) 247 relied on. [Para 5]
naM çfØ;k lafgrk] 1973 & èkkjk 439 & tekur & vkosnd d¢ dCts ls 60 yhVj ns'kh efnjk vfÒx`ghr & fxjrkj & fiNys ,d ekl ls ifjj¨èk Ò¨x jgk & vkj¨ii= Qkby dj fn;k x;k & pky pyu esa lqèkkj dk volj fn;k tkuk pkfg, & lkeqnkf;d lsok dh Òkouk d¢ vuqlkj vkosnd n¨ Qynkj ;k Nk;knkj o`{k¨a dk i©èkkj¨i.k vkSj ns[kHkky djs & tekur eatwjA 2020 ¼3½ ,e ih ,y ts ¼fØŒ½ 247 voyafcrA ¼iSjk 5½
ORDER
1. The applicant has filed this FIRST application under section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, for grant of bail. Applicant has been arrested on 6.3.2023 by Police Station- Kanhiwada, District-Seoni, relating to FIR/Crime No.57/2023 for the offence punishable under section 34 (2) of the M.P. Excise Act, 1915.
2. It is the submission of learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is suffering confinement since 6.3.2023 and charge-sheet has already been filed. It is further submitted that as per allegations, 60 liters of country made liquor has been seized from possession of the applicant. No custodial interrogation is required. Applicant does not bear any criminal record. Applicant learnt the lesson hard way and would mend his ways to become better citizen and would not indulge in same nature of offence in future. Applicant undertakes to cooperate in trial and will abide by all the terms and conditions as imposed by this Court. Applicant further undertakes to perform community service to purge his misdeeds, if any, and to serve National/Environmental/Social Cause. Upon these grounds, counsel prayed for bail to the applicant.
3. Learned Government Advocate for the State opposed the bail application and prayed for its dismissal.
4. Heard learned counsel for the parties at length and perused the case-diary.
5. Considering the above submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and the fact situation, a chance be given to applicant for course correction, therefore, without commenting on the merits of the case, and as per the spirit of community service echoed in the order of Sunita Gandharva v. State of M.P. reported in 2020(3) MPLJ (Cri.) 247, the application is allowed. It is hereby directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing personal bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of trial Court.
6. This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the applicant:-
1. The applicant will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond executed by him;
2. The applicant will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may be;
3. The applicant will not indulge himself in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be;
4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused;
5. The applicant will not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial;
6. The applicant will not leave India without previous permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be;
7. The applicant shall not involve in any criminal activity in future and would participate in creative pursuits.
8. It is made clear that this bail is granted once the case is made out for bail and thereafter, direction for plantation of saplings is given and it is not the case where a person intends to serve social cause can be given bail without considering the merits.
,rn~}kjk ;g Hkh funZsf'kr fd;k tkrk gS fd vkosnd 02 ikS/kksa dk ¼Qy nsus okys isM+ vFkok uhe@ihiy½ jksi.k djsxk rFkk mUgsa vius vkl iM+ksl esa isM+ksa dh lqj{kk ds fy, ckM+ yxkus dh O;oLFkk djuh gksxh rkfd ikS/ks lqjf{kr jg ldsaA vkosnd dk ;g drZO; gS fd u dsoy ikS/kksa dks yxk;k tk,s] cfYd mUgsa iks"k.k Hkh fn;k tk,A ^^o`{kkjksi.k ds lkFk] o`{kkiks"k.k Hkh vko';d gSA^^ vkosnd fo'ks"kr% 6&8 QhV Åaps ikS/ks@isM+ksa dks yxk;sxs rkfd os 'kh?kz gh iw.kZ fodflr gks ldsaA vuqikyu lqfuf'pr djus ds fy,] vkosnd dks fjgk fd;s tkus dh fnukad ls 30 fnuksa ds Hkhrj fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k o`{kksa@ikS/kksa ds jksi.k ds lHkh QksVks çLrqr djus gksxsaA rRi'pkr~ vxys rhu o"kZ rd gj rhu eghus esa vkosnd ds }kjk fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k Áxfr fjiksVZ çLrqr dh tk,xhA
o`{kksa dh çxfr ij fuxjkuh j[kuk vkosnd dk drZO; gS D;ksafd i;kZoj.k {kj.k ds dkj.k ekuo vfLrRo nkao ij gS vkSj U;k;ky; vu
The court considered the spirit of community service and the applicant's age in granting bail, subject to strict conditions to ensure compliance and future conduct.
Granting bail based on the nature of the allegation and the spirit of community service.
Grant of bail based on lack of criminal past, trial being triable by lower court, and expected time for trial conclusion.
The court granted bail under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. due to the lengthy trial process and the applicant's claims of false implication.
The court may grant bail under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. based on the absence of heinous offences in the applicant's criminal history and the likelihood of a lengthy trial, while imposing specific condi....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.