SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 110

ANAND PATHAK
Mahasingh Parte – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Naresh Kumar Sharma for applicant; Narendra Chourasiya, Government Advocate for respondent/State.

ORDER

1. The applicant has filed this FIRST application under section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, for grant of bail. Applicant has been arrested on 6.3.2023 by Police Station- Kanhiwada, District-Seoni, relating to FIR/Crime No.57/2023 for the offence punishable under section 34 (2) of the M.P. Excise Act, 1915.

2. It is the submission of learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is suffering confinement since 6.3.2023 and charge-sheet has already been filed. It is further submitted that as per allegations, 60 liters of country made liquor has been seized from possession of the applicant. No custodial interrogation is required. Applicant does not bear any criminal record. Applicant learnt the lesson hard way and would mend his ways to become better citizen and would not indulge in same nature of offence in future. Applicant undertakes to cooperate in trial and will abide by all the terms and conditions as imposed by this Court. Applicant further undertakes to perform community service to purge his misdeeds, if any, and to serve National/Environmental/Social Cause. Upon these grounds, counsel prayed for bail to the applicant.

3. Learned Government Advocate for the Sta

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top